Oprano Adult Industry Forums - View Single Post - New Law Focuses on Website Featuring Underage Girls

pornlaw · 07-15-2008

My point is that it is a slippery slope and I dont think commercial vs. non-commercial gets you there. CP is much different than nude pics. They do not mean the same thing. If so, Joe Francis would have been in jail for CP since several of his models that flashed were under 18. Pic hosting sites do make money so it is a commercial venture even if the poster does not.

Try to find a law stating it is against the law to take a naked pic of your child in any state. Or as Hammer points out, his mom and most of our moms would be in jail. Almost everyone has the obligatory "kid in the tub" pic in their family album.

I see this law getting overruled as unconstitutional.

07-15-2008	#31
pornlaw Future BROmaster Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 266	Re: New Law Focuses on Website Featuring Underage Girls My point is that it is a slippery slope and I dont think commercial vs. non-commercial gets you there. CP is much different than nude pics. They do not mean the same thing. If so, Joe Francis would have been in jail for CP since several of his models that flashed were under 18. Pic hosting sites do make money so it is a commercial venture even if the poster does not. Try to find a law stating it is against the law to take a naked pic of your child in any state. Or as Hammer points out, his mom and most of our moms would be in jail. Almost everyone has the obligatory "kid in the tub" pic in their family album. I see this law getting overruled as unconstitutional.