Quote:
Originally Posted by rhetorical
I think that pretty much sums up what I said. I actually don't care if they shot their private orgies then put them on the net. My opinion still stands and what they did was wrong. This is not a first amendment case. It is a bunch of sleazebags getting laid, perhaps publishing the events, then trying to get us to support them. I am sorry. I work hard. I pay everyone involved with me, as you well know, and I do it right. I do not want to be associated with scumbags who party their faces off, make promises they can't keep and then have the audacity to ask us for money to support them. Not only will I not support this shit, but I will do my best to point out that I am not in that business and it is bad for all of us.
|
I don't disagree with you with you and I think people like this are bad for the business too but that's not what you said. lol
You said "i believe you are wrong on this. They had "parties" that had nothing to do with the website where girls were hired to fuck them and their friends."
And I said, no, the parties did have to do with the website and they were held to produce content for the website not just so they and their friends could get fucked.