Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
That's what they claimed but that's not necessarily what happened and not what they were charged with. One of their websites featured orgies (sex parties) so the allegation was that they had these sex parties for the purpose of producing content for the site, in which case, all performers should have been paid.
|
I think that pretty much sums up what I said. I actually don't care if they shot their private orgies then put them on the net. My opinion still stands and what they did was wrong. This is not a first amendment case. It is a bunch of sleazebags getting laid, perhaps publishing the events, then trying to get us to support them. I am sorry. I work hard. I pay everyone involved with me, as you well know, and I do it right. I do not want to be associated with scumbags who party their faces off, make promises they can't keep and then have the audacity to ask us for money to support them. Not only will I not support this shit, but I will do my best to point out that I am not in that business and it is bad for all of us.