Quote:
Originally Posted by Mediaguy
Shellee.
Mark never posts on here about you unless you first enter a thread with off-topic comments and accusations.
What you're doing is called "projection".
You're the one who hijacks all the threads one of us at 2much posts in with your friggin obsession; we only reply to your misrepresentations and distortions (sometimes).
This very thread is an example of you not being able to let go. Your post was about an account from LiveCamNetwork.com and not your site since that gift function is available only to LCN users, but you had to try to tie it in with the main spam theme we and the others here were discussing.
You know we don't spam. You know it's against our policy. So your statements are again deliberately misleading.
Now, no need to reply. Please. Let's get back on topic here and follow your suggestion to "stop subjecting everyone to our dirty laundry".
If you must reply, please explain why you think CAN-SPAM is unfair, and that spam is ok (as you posted in another thread).
|
I am sorry but I remember things very differently in every thread the insults towards me came from you and Mark first - if not please share an example where I started anything on here with an insult of you or your company first.
You admitted in another thread knowing that people who signed up as an affiliate for your licensees were spammed and you corrected it when it was brought to your attention and you blamed it on an error by ccbill.
In response to why I think CAN-SPAM is unfair is because I look at the general advertising practices across the board and why is it ok to have junk snail mail still and yet SPAM mail is targeted as illegal but none of these other practices are. I wish there was a better approach because sometimes i get mails that are spam that are advertisements that I find of value and appreciate. I think the law is a little too broad but as it applies to adult it is appropriate and beneficial in reducing adult material from reaching minors. The law is good when it applies to the abuse of technology but the amount of effort that goes into finding and prosecuting offenders brings us to selective prosecution to make a point (like the irs scaring us every April with some tax fraud case). There are people still spamming the law has worked in general to reduce spam but many factor the cost of a fine into their bottom line and others just keep doing it knowing they won't be found out or prosecuted because they stay under the radar of being a value case to the AG.