Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
My point was that you don't see the implications of violating the injunction and it is a fact - Ask your legal counsel; violating the injunction or the law can result in a fine or jail time, etc. even if your not a Top Bucks affiliate.
|
You don't need legal counsel to "sign" that acknowledgement; all you're doing is saying you are in compliance with (as TopBucks has been all along) with the CANSPAM act. That's it.
That's why I posted the body of the consequent documents - to show that it's no big deal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
Top Bucks is just one more company now under the watchful eye or the Federal Prosecutors office
|
TopBucks is no more under that "watchful eye" than anybody in the business whose affiliates have tried email/spam to get some sign ups.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
I would think a Data Magician could really see the details without me laying it all out there with some long drawn out explanation including my resume and net worth to validate a personal opinion on Oprano about an affiliate program caught spamming or another one getting sued.
|
What's a Data Magician?
You had no "laying it all out" to do. And actually you laid nothing out; you just copy-pasted. This isn't an accusation, it's just an observation of what you did.
Since TopBucks was NOT "caught spamming" (read the documentation before you make accusations), however they HAVE set an important precedent for programs in this case protecting programs from idiot affiliates who want to spam. Read it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
I know more about the legal complaints, legislation, proposed bills etc on the horizon than you do if you would have read my opinions and then followed the filings you would have known that much; maybe you could help with making a positive difference and shape the future of this industry and the laws and cases being filed by working as hard as I do lobbying our legislators, senators, congressmen to look past the content and at the misuse and abuse of technology and focus on the thieves as they are in abundance in mainstream and not all in adult. Write them and tell them to stop using your tax payer dollars for grant money paid to men to search for possible obscenity cases in porn resulting in zero prosecutions. The millions of dollars wasted on this could go to better use.
|
One can spend thousands acquiring the documentation; however one must read it. Beyond that, one must understand what one is reading.
You may have an "inside" connection or friends on the administrative side of things who can make you feel like you're in touch with "the future" and "big cases" for the industry, but so far that feeling has caused you to make nothing but false claims.
Your prophetizing can cast a falsely negative light on programs such as TopBucks if you interpret the information incorrectly or, as in this case, you don't interpret it at all and just post an email out of context.
The TopBucks case has NOTHING to do with what you are referring to, ie. the FBI cadre assigned to surfing porn to spot possible "obscenity" cases.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
I work really hard at things I don't often get credit for that is the honor of consulting your paid to let other people have the lime light with your ideas.
|
Work a little harder, analyze your data, and report on your findings; don't just post out of the blue so that insinuation becomes the principle weight of your "message".
.