Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
Greg, As I previously stated in another post....
The first Law Suit filed in this case with TMM and NR was completely if not totally different than this one. So, you all thinking this is the same stuff all over again it isn't
|
You're wrong. Read the sources from which you copied - even the headline says "
amend lawsuit".
You're not helping yourself by confusing issues and then industry-prophesizing based on skimpy knowledge and short-term exposure to the business.
Both these things happened before you were in the adult industry, or even exposed to online marketing, so you may not have the full background or history of the thing at the back of your mind.
But at least
read the source before claiming you can't find both sides of the story - and find out the causes and circumstances behind the litigations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelleehale
is significant enough to draw a lot of attention to how affiliate marketing works and the technologies being used in the current model legal,
|
In Consumption Junction's case it certainly can serve to highlight unethical practices and hopeful will serve to get various wares made illegal the way spam has become illegal.
However this in no way points to the downfall or collapse of the affiliate marketing model, while in fact the CJNetworks case if won may help refurbish affiliate marketing and turn stuff like Zango into the legal equivalent of hot potatoes - certainly people who've lost money to these types will be happy.