Thread: Jury Duty
View Single Post
Old 02-21-2008   #9
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: Jury Duty

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaylorMarieXXX View Post
I thought misuse of existing resources is pretty close to the heart of fiscal conservatism.

I always understood fiscal conservatism to be primarily about limiting pork barrel spending, as opposed to poor execution of something vital to our economy. Now, cutting away at the bloated carcass of bureaucracy is good old fashioned conservatism, and I haven't got a problem with that either.

I think jury duty is a good idea - I think the management of it is piss poor, and as such is due for an overhaul. Not least among its problems is the fact that the people you want to be on a jury - people that want to be there and have a vested interest in justice - shouldn't resent the fact they are missing a day's wages and are being treated as though they have fucked up.

Spending money on things that make sense and having them executed efficiently and well doesn't make someone a bad person or mean that they are opposed to all social programs (which, generally speaking, are the hallmarks of those claiming fiscal conservatism). It simply means they have a solid and reasonable interest in how their tax money is spent.
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote