Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Would it not also be important to know when those statements were made? If I remember correctly, that quote has been on their site since about 1999. With all the changes, challenges, and rulings made since then, would it not be something that would need to be re-examined from time to time?
|
The best way to get to the bottom of this is to simply go to the source. I will call Jeff on Wednesday and get some insight from him. If that statement has been up since 1999 without being altered or changed in anyway, I too would be concerned. But again, we can speculate but Jeff has the answers.
As for what advice I would give, my black letter law advice would be to comply. If you have full nudity have the statement up and keep the records. But there are certainly gray areas to 2257 and the Adam Walsh Act. What most people in the biz don't realize is that as the law currently sits almost everyone is in violation. Most dont even realize it.
Every client has their own comfort zone in regards to risk. Perhaps Met-Art is willing to push the limits. Each client has to be told the black letter law but also given options as well based upon their level of risk adversion. I suspect there's a reason to the statement. Again, I will ask Jeff on Wednesday.
Michael
http://www.adultbizlaw.com