Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
Without actually reviewing the site, I cannot really state whether they are exempt or not. But I know Jeffrey Douglas and I know he is a well versed and well prepared attorney.
I would not expect him to lend his name to such a public statement unless he was sure (as much as a lawyer could be) that the site was exempt.
That's really sticking your proverbial neck out for a client. I dont think Jeff would do that without the facts backing him up.
Michael
http://www.adultbizlaw.com |
There are two possiblities: 1) that Mr Douglas didn't ever truly express an opinion, or 2) he was presented content without context, without explaining how the marketing would be done, etc.
Further, that notice has been on that site for quite a long time, and since then there has been changes in the definitions for 2257 requirements, rulings regarding certain clothed video still being porn, etc.
Times change. One lawyer consultation 7 or 8 years ago doesn't make you safe.