Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
Looking at turgid nipples often results in a turgid penis which is of course the definition of lascivious. The law says "lascivious displays of the genitals" or "actual or simulated sex" but I seriously doubt that any Hollywod scenes would be what most reasonable people would construe as simulated sex and I've never seen a Hollywood movie scene that showed a lascivious display of the genitals. In most cases, most of what you think you see is a response of your imagination.
Now, on the other hand, a photo of a chick about to put her mouth on a penis but not actually doing it or a photo of a guy with his penis about to enter a vagina but not actually entering, is pretty much going to be considered "simulated sex" by just about everyone.
So, comparing Hollywood sex to porn sex and hoping that the government is going to start applying 2257 to Hollywood and thinking that will lead to a public outcry of support for the porn industry is nothing more than wishful thinking.
|
Isn't it Monster's Ball where Halley Berry gets stone cold bent over and fucked like crazy? Tits flying, moaning and groaning and being treated like a total slut thereby fulfilling at least a dozen of my feverish fantasies all at one time?
require a custodian of records for movies that have scenes like this is all I want
You put the exact same thing in a porn site, no cock visible, you think you could get away without having a 2257 statement and a CoR's page?
spaz