Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby
Yes, I certainly do consider that to be sematics. It most certainly has little or nothing to do with the topic du jour, and criticizing the grammar/verbage is indeed attacking the messenger.
The only reason to nitpick the message is to attempt to discredit the messenger, because the argument against the message is weak.
|
I disagree. When the argument is lame, as so many of Sarettah's are, then you need to point that out. Language is like a tapestry, woven with care. Or woven with care. Get the difference? Sarettah, bless his heart, does his best but falls very short. He fires broadsides from the hip with little substance, but most never question it. I do.