Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby
Jim already answered that in a reply in another thread. see below...
|
[/quote]Participants received $300 for private parties that often served as an audition for film roles. [/quote]
I always give industry people the benefit of the doubt. Which I did in their case right from the get go. It was like pulling teeth for anyone to make the statement Jim did and it took months. He seems to have been caught up in a whirlwind created by a bunch of guys who partied till they dropped and made no provision for the consequences.
When I asked Walters after he posted on some board somewhere about this very thing he did not reply. He did however make his case and as such I felt should have answered the question. Jim is pleading legal strategy for his silence. But you can't have it both ways.
It was the continued dodging of this question that aroused my suspicion. I certainly don't support paying girls to party then claiming it is a porn business issue. If these parties are bogus confections of an overzealous prosecutor, then we owe them full support. If not, then I am iffy about the whole thing. BTW, this is not all based on what I have read. I have heard a few stories along the way before this bust.