Re: Bill Seeks to Have Photo Processors Sound Child Porn Alarm
Quote:
Originally Posted by venturi
Aside from the preposterous notion that generally speaking a minimum wage earning 1Hr Photo shop employee has the proper training to judge the content of a photo as being legal or not; it is laughable to imagine that child pornographers or any other felonious shutter bug would use a common photo lab to develop their chromes. And hello Ms. Ray, this is 2007. The majority of your constituents above the age of ten are carrying cell phones with digital cameras in them. Does this twit actually believe that her bill is going to snare any actual criminals?
This is nothing but pre-election fodder to "demonstrate" that she is "protecting our children". It's a waste of legislative resources and a waste of tax payer money to even submit this bill for consideration.
Ah well, I'm sure we'll see more of this ilk coming down the media pike now that all the candidates are gearing up for ClusterFuck 2008.  |
Well said. You should come around more often!
__________________
We are putting the bastards of this world on notice; greed and corruption will always be met with "a voice made of ink and rage." "Never try and be like anyone else" - Hunter S. Thompson "The truth is the truth no matter how you try and package a lie" - Shellee Hale
|