Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
All well said LM and I would agree with most of what you said.
However, I saw the thumbs that were running on one of slicks sites, I never went through to the galleries.
There was no excuse for the thumbs I saw. They were clearly targetting one type of customer and one type only.
Putting aside DN's legal right versus Slick's legal right etc for a second. My personal viewpoint is that anyone targetting that particular market is as bad as the customers in that particular market and the producers of that particular market and any so called "legal" sites or illegal sites that cater to that market. They should all die a very slow painful death and I personally don't give a fuck what anyone does to them legal or illegal. I do not care how we get rid of them, I just want them gone.
|
Slick claims on GFY that most of his thumbs were cut by the autocropper and that if you click through to the galleries the content should match exactly. The question is then is it the thumbs or the content that's questionable, and all the sites he was promoting from what I saw were from reputable (so to speak) sponsors. It leaves a fine tangled web, doesn't it?