Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyMischief
You can try to muddy the waters with your speculation
|
Oh, I see how this works. The anti DN force is allowed to speculate all they want and assume that directnic did this out of the blue, on their own with no govenement inquiry starting he whole thing off, assume that none of the sponsors have privacy right clauses in their releases and assume that because Slick used sponsor content on a site that HE is PERSNALLY responsible for that the content was totally legal.
But if I make one speculation I am muddyng the waters?
You want in on the bet thread LM ?