[Rcourt64]

Apparently the point I'm attempting to get across is not fully sinking in.

The whole point of my examples "using the candy, the truck, and the jolly red man" are not to state that AFF is doing the right thing, if I own a dating site I would not embed bogus profiles myself.

The point Im trying to get across, "which might of got carried away in this thread" is as follows:

They can't take someone to court and accuse them of doing malicious practices, when most of the advertising industry does the same.

How come its ok to hire some lowlife drunk of the street and stuff a pillow in his gut, put him in a red suit, and then line up our children nation wide thu out just every mall or store in America and let our children sit on some strangers lap and whisper bulshit into there ears about how he's coming down down the chiminey with toys & gifts. or have him stand out side every mall or store ringing a bell to get people to donate money for the salvation army.

There just examples, are they right thing to do? NO.
But it's being done now for centuries, and no one ever said anything about it, it was okey dokey to do.
So how can you attempt to sue someone for impersonating a character on a dating website but allow all the rest of the bullshit to fly?
So your all saying if AFF make bogus profiles of Santa and donated the $$$ bucks, then its alright? thats BULLSHIT !!

When I say its ok with what there doing, I mean in the standards of most publicity and marketing advertising which everyone else is doing the same thing, you can't pick out just one and try to bring them down.
while they let the rest of them slip by.