[spazlabz]

I have to say I agree with the overall premise of this article. Guilty until proven innocent is just about as backwards as you can get in this country.

But consider this, most of us, if we heard so-n-so inc got busted because they could not prove that every one of their models were over the age of 18 at the time of the shoot, would turn on them. Its ugly and we dont like to think of ourselves like that but the specter of underage content is so intimidating to this industry that a lot of people will clammer and scream about it even when they should just be keeping their mouths shut.

we all know that every legitimate company in this industry abhores child porn. It is our common norms and mores. Most of us have children and the exploitation of anyone not of legal age is deeply offensive. But we have also gone off the deep end here.

Dakota Fanning will be appearing partially nude in a new movie she is releasing that examines child sexual abuse. One has to wonder exactly what kind of a reaction that is going to get and will the Federal Government arrest the makers of that movie? probably not

but if you have a 'teen' site and are not extremely careful to make sure you dont forget to have that the girls are legal and a 2257 statement written exactly the way the DoJ says you have to have it written then you will be investigated..... we are targets, big fat tagets because we give Christians shameful erections and the industry makes a lot of money.


spaz