Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hell Puppy
The tummy pic gives me a tongue-on, does that make me a pedo?
Where'd Peaches go? We need a judgement. I must've been wrong about her being able to take it as well as she dishes it...
|
Nope, just finally realized where this went. As I told you, I wanted notice - I got it.
BTW, you never once told me the model you were putting the little boy's underoos on was over 18. In fact, you constantly referred to her on SMS as 18. So, is she? Or were you putting them on the model that you showed the picture of, who is not 18?
I thought we had agreed to disagree. I don't think little children's clothing should be used on models who are months or a year over legal age. You turned that into me saying you were a pedo and stealing money when we all know you'd be tapping into my box of Todd Toys. Personally, I don't think a single person is going to join your site using "Batman Comics" as a search phrase.
I DO think putting someone barely legal in little children's clothing is not a line I would personally cross. Someone like the model you posted or Sabby are different. I already said that when I used Vanilla as an example on the playground. That's MY opinion. I gave it. I realized my mistake.
It's like I told someone I was dating who asked me if I loved him: "Don't ask the question if you're not ready for all the possible answers.".
