Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Useless
If I could stick my tongue in through the fly, I'm all for it.
We're talking boys' briefs here, right? So, it's not like you're trying to convince anyone that the rather large breasted chick in the picture is a young boy. I'm thinking it's going to take a shit load of duct tape to achieve that. And you certainly aren't trying to make her look like a |itt|e gir| - you are, after all, using boys' underwear. So, um...what am I missing here?
Would there be the same amount of objection if you were putting 20 year-old male models in girls' panties, with their big hairy balls hanging over the edges?
|
Yup, exactly right.
But there seems to be a knee jerk reaction, at least from some parents, that anything that remotely reminds them of a child shouldn't be anywhere near porn.
To me there's a huge difference between being playful like a child and trying to pass someone off as a child to give the pedo's something to spank their meat to.
There are plenty of sites out there that do exactly that though, really go after the 18 year olds that could pass for 15-16 and do the whole pig tails and lollipop theme. I should check the Oprano sponsor list before I name names though....heh.