Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Peaches
Well...you already know MY opinions on this but I'll share them with the peanut gallery:
When you take an 18 year old girl and put her in something that someone YOUNGER than 18 would wear or put her in an environment that someone YOUNGER than 18 years old would be in, you've not crossed a legal line, just a moral one to ME. But we know I'm the prude in the biz.
18 year old girls do everything they can to look older in real life, not younger. Ergo, you're not portraying a true 18 year old by putting her comic inspired Underoos. That's what 10 year old girls wear and young boys wear.
By putting a technically legal 18 year old in clothing that depicts her as under 18, ergo illegal, I think you're crossing dangerous lines. Ditto with the wearing of the kids Halloween costumes and posting on playgrounds - again something REAL 18 year old girls wouldn't be caught dead doing.
Go to any mall and look at the 18 year olds. They are trying to look 24, not 12. Yet you are filming them in cartoon character underoos - little boy ones at that.
But once again, I am not your target demographic - men who want to see girls that are technically legal but are dressed as children are 
I fully expect to be in the minority here  |
Peaches, you ignorant slut.....
You're completely blinded by the idea of something intended for kids being in porn.
We're not trying to make anyone look under 18. There's no way any rational person would look at a pic like we're describing and go "oh, she's wearing underroo's, she must be 12!". If I put on a pair of care bear panties will you think I'm 12?
And I could give a rat's ass what an 18-24 year old wears to the mall. What I care about is what might make a guy sitting at home surfing the internet get interested enough to pull out his credit card.
Oh, and by the way, the model showed up wearing a kids spiderman watch, and we had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with that. Just a weird coincidence.