[PornoDoggy]

Well, you were right ... I never said the article was false.

I saw no evidence to suggest that the article was false.

I thought that comments about the fact that the paper which released it was Italian said a lot more about the people making the comments than it did about the facts.

I've said all along that I don't consider that weapon to be banned, chemical, or out-of-place in an environment like Falujah.

I'm not trying to justify the death of innocent civilians.

I am saying that the fact that the folks we are fighting more than welcome the death of innocent civilians, but go out of their way to cause the death of innocent civilians, has to be taken into consideration. The fact that the civilians were hit by the weapon may have been the goal of/fault of the terrorists, and not the people who used the weapon.

It's a mean nasty weapon. I won't rule out the possibilty that the person who used it did so deliberately, but I don't see any reason to believe that they did just because a mean nasty weapon was used.

If some cocksucker is shooting at me, I am going to shoot back with everything I got. A soldier in the field has two jobs - stay alive and kill bad guys, not necessarily in that order. Bad things happen when mean nasty weapons are being used.