Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheEnforcer
Regardless of whether you agree or not with the ruling the judge is correct in the respect that as a lower court judge he IS bound by the higher courts ruling.
|
That's not so much the point. They're basing this shit on seperation of church and state, which has nothing to do with keeping religion and politics seperate. Nor was it implied to keep kids from learning about religious things in school. It sole purpose was to say that America will not choose 1 religion as a "national religion" over another religion, nothing more.
Allah, Buddha, Christ, Zeus, etc etc are all referred to as "God", believeing in "God" does not automatically make you a Christian. I think if kids want to say it they should be able to. So suddenly because 1 or 2 people might not participate EVERYONE should be excluded? That's not how America works, at least not the framers intentions on how it should work. What happens if some kid doesn't like chocolate milk? Does that mean Nobody can have chocolate milk?
Congress/Courts need to start worrying about the shit that's important. Not pacifying one small group of people by stripping everyone else's rights away, not legislating on steroids in baseball or worrying about Terri Schiavo. When did we get our priorities so out of whack? oh n/m... in 2000 when idiots elected a bible thumping redneck.