Joan, if this is a fly by post you'll not see this...but, I'll take my chances....
Quote:
|
since IFFOR plans to contribute to various child protection associations, ASACP would accept such a contribution.
|
Of course ASACP would......
Quote:
|
ASACP has been in negotiations with the International Foundation for Online Responsibility (IFFOR) and ICM for it to serve as a hotline for reviewing reports of suspected child pornography and to carry out the secondary monitoring of .xxx sites for child pornography.
|
Is this not the function of ASACP in the first place? Whether it's .xxx, .com, .net, .org?
And can you elaborate on 'secondary monitoring'?
Do you believe that true CP site webmasters would use an .xxx TLD...espcially since it is NOT mandatory? Isn't the point of .xxx, according to IFFOR and ICM, to present a venue for 'responsible' adult webmasters in their online business ventures? You are obviously aware that CP webmasters aren't exactly the most 'responsible' bunch.
Quote:
|
I also support the online adult industry developing their own credible business practices in conjunction with other impacted stakeholders and support the IFFOR initiative to create a line of communication between the adult industry and the global community.”
|
Do you not believe that the online adult industry already has 'credible business practices' in place without being associated with these 'impacted stakeholders'? How do you envision this creation of 'a line of communication between the adult industry and the global community'? How will .xxx promote such communication?
Quote:
|
I am surprised that people are attacking ASACP for potentially providing the use of cpHotline.org to IFFOR.
|
IFFOR, as with any company, or individual has always had use of cphotline.org and ASACP...that's what you're there for. Why did ASACP feel it necessary to establish to the public that IFFOR can make use of the ASACP resources?