View Single Post
Old 05-25-2005   #25
Dravyk
Easy Like Sunday Morning
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Dravyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Behind a couch, somewhere in Philly
Posts: 7,628
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by FightThePatent@May 24 2005, 03:46 PM
Her answer is that "the injunction will ONLY cover FSC members. "

She also said that an official PR on this subject should be coming out shortly.

If DOJ knocks on a FSC member door, the company should comply with DOJ requests, and then get on the phone to FSC.
Ok, I'm missing something. In regards to the following: "the injunction will ONLY cover FSC members." and "If DOJ knocks on a FSC member door, the company should comply with DOJ requests".

Now last I knew the word injunction sorta infers that somebody is legally barred from doing something. How then is it that if there is an injunction a member must allow the DOJ's requests???

An injunction should mean by its very definition that the member would inform the DOJ that they are a FSC member and then the DOJ must legally respond by twirling on their heals and leaving. So, I don't get it.

Mind you, I'm not a member either. It's just those two elements together do not make sense to me as presented here.
Dravyk is offline   Reply With Quote