Quote:
Originally posted by aeon@May 21 2005, 05:04 PM
Dont' worry...we'll let you be the test monkey on this one. You can find out whether the CP defintions of sexually explicit apply to all adult content. Now post some URL's...
I'll even send you smokes in the joint as a sign of good will and appreciation. 
|
Geez, you just want to piss don't you ?
The record keeping requirements that we commonly call 2257 are the recordkeeping requirements of the Sexual exploitation of children etc act.
The definition that I posted is the definition that pertains to which records they are talking about.
It is one fucking law with several sections.
As far as the definition of what needs the records required by 2257 of chapter 110 of title 18, they have been pretty fucking clear.
Also, did you miss my "when in doubt, over comply" which was basically agreement with you. If you do non nude of younger looking girls in suggestive positions etc, you are probably not required to keep the records, but it definitely would not hurt you to have the records in case a prosecutor attempts to streeeeetch the law a bit.
If you missed my groucho face at the end of my comment saying it's about the kids then you misssed the fact I was being sarcastic, because I agree comfuckingpletely that this is part of the feds attempt to take pornography out via a back door.
geez...