Quote:
Originally posted by aeon@Aug 5 2004, 08:35 PM
It's great and all...debating this, but the reality is - most people know the 10th circuit struck down the defintion of secondary producer under clinton but it's been re-interpreted and for a reason.
If they decide to enforce this, and the right leaning smut peddlers are gonna help put them back in office, who's gonna be the test case?
Bless INGdirect and an apostille - I won't be the test.
|
Hey Aeon,
The thing is, it has'nt been reinterpreted. The DOJ is using the same language in their rules as Reno did. The 10th circuit already said that language would not stand.
And yes, the test case is the bitch, the whole problem with laws and such is the amount of time and money that most folk can afford in the fight is miniscule compared to the amount of time and money the government can spend.
When I first went to Jim (my lawyer, a free speech guy) with all of this. He went through the changes for me and gave me a call a few hours later and said "You know that most of that is pretty much blatantly unconstitutional, don't you". I said yeah, but do you want to go and fight it on contingency for me ? At which point he just laughed and laughed...
