Quote:
Originally posted by RawAlex@Jun 22 2004, 06:04 AM
Buff, talk about typical debate club bullshit.
if someone is against the specific actions taken by bush, then they have to be "for the bad guy". Not liking Bush's personal war on Saddam doesn't mean we were all going to go over and give him a hug and tell him how nice of a dictator he is.
It's stupid.
When you want to talk about re-writing history, let's talk about Chenney still talking about how Saddam and BinLadin were best buddies and they were both working together to get the US. Let's talk about how the Bush administration has managed to make the US public believe that the war in Iraq is as a result of the 9/11 attacks, that Saddam is somehow personally responsible. Let's talk about how the whole WMD thing just sort of disappeared into the wind... and how suddenly that wasn't the justification for war.
No movie in the world can be as bad as the reality that is Bushworld.
Alex
|
What's any of that got to do with the points the guy made about Moore's film?
What i find most amusing about Moore is that there really are quite valid and sensible arguements about the war in iraq on both sides of the debate. So valid and sensible in fact, that Moore shouldn't need to distort the truth and completely ommit certain facts to make his point.
But he does, and thus, entirely lacks credibility.