Quote:
Originally posted by gilgy@Jun 6 2004, 07:11 PM
What do you mean for once?
|
ok, since you are new, then I will do some free thinking for you...
I said "Saddam, who were the leader/dictator of Iraq, should not have a public TV trial"
You said "Nuremberg trial, is a precedent."
I ask "Hitler, who were the leader/dictator of Germany, did he have a public TV trial"
You said "Hitler dead, moron"
I said "you were wrong"
To sum this up, it means that you can not compare the Nuremberg trial with the trial against Saddam, since Saddam was the dictator, the icon, the synonym of power, and the Nuremberg gang were officers. If the Nuremberg should be precedent, then it would need someone with atleast the same featues as Saddam, and the only man was Hitler, but as you said yourself he was dead, so he could not stand trial.
Saddam is not dead, and he is a icon for many, he is the father of an ideologi, proving that he was wrong to his followers would be like crucifying jesus... even when he bleeds, then his followers will shake their heads in disbelief, because prophets can not really die, they transform into martys or even gods!
If you do not understand this, then I could do a hand puppet show for you, but since I´m french, then I do not wear socks....