Quote:
Originally posted by chodadog@May 17 2004, 06:19 PM
So, discussing the possibility that it's more than a coincidence is liberal idiocy? I'm just trying to figure out what exactly you called liberal idiocty. Was it the article, or was it Joe's first reply, and why?
|
No you're not. I've already made it clear...
Trying to look for reasons to shift the blame from the murderer that severed the guy's head is the liberal idiocy. It's looking for reason's to not realize it was murder and somehow "caused"...which is why it's so easy to bait some people - it is no one else's responsibility...the coincidence is just fodder for conspiratorial minds. Just like the religious who think a person was healed after they "pray". But shit...some terrorist that had access to his university had his password - prolly half the people in the computer science's department at my school had my password - they hacked for fun...it could be he was on bin laden's payroll...or mossad...or CIA, or IRA - hell even delta force, an overweight navy seal, he could have been jordanian intelligence - could be's...I "could" win the lottery tomorrow...
George Bush didn't kill that man...unless he speaks arabic. That's the point as well as looking for any coincidence to prove an agenda or platform is wrong. That's called propoganda.