Quote:
Originally posted by aeon@May 17 2004, 05:32 PM
The idiocy is the implied assumption a coincidence is something more than that as was so clearly shown by certain responses.
Because there's some remote connection that doesn't change the fact that those "sand niggers/camel jockeys/freedom fighters/resistence fighthers"...took a human being who wasn't in a uniform, didn't shoot at them, used a knife and sawed his head off. That is no one's fault but their own.
Baiting some idealogue into a losing debate doesn't change that fact. I've answered you're question by the actual piss match...you should read and re-read it. Because someone responded like an idiot to the "bait" isn't my fault - nor is every death in Iraq Bush's fault...check out the point about liberals responding like robots...and calling a person who openly claims themself a liberal isn't slinging terms in the least. Now it's time for you to use the 1300 or so cc's of space between yers ears.
|
Uhh, so you completely rule out the possibility that it is more than a coincidence? Isn't that a little narrow minded? What if he was co-operating with Zacarias Moussaoui and he was killed by AQ because they thought he had spilled the beans after being detained?
Is that situation so unbelievable?