Actually, they have shut down several sites and have grabbed those customer lists. Then they have written those customers and told them to pay $3500 or be sued. It is up to the customer to then provide proof that they have done nothing wrong. So they are assuming wrongdoing, with very sketchy circumstantial evidence.
I'm not saying that those people haven't done anything wrong, just worried because they are assumed guilty without any real, tangible proof. The burden of proof should be on DirecTV, and not on the individual to prove their innocence.
|