Quote:
Originally posted by roscoe@Oct 23 2003, 08:06 PM
I don't have a problem with the comments. Not at all...everybody is intitled to their opinion..and i can't help it that some peoples tates are all in their mouth.
Trev if your gonna say things about not being accteped by LL i think you should tell us who it is so we all can go and look and see.
hell if its true i may be in good company. From what i understand alot of LL's have content suppliers they won't list.
I mean i can say alot of things with no proof and make it sound real good also.
But as i said in my first reply..thanks for the thread guys....business is up since this started...seems alot of folks don't quite share your opinion of our content.
Thanks again!
|
Yep, I mentioned LLs, no I won't tell you who. Do your own research. Here is the problem with pixmasters content.
Quote:
|
Pix Masters Limits the number of sets it sells of any one CD. This protects against the overuse of our content, which in turn helps your revenues last longer with the same content!
|
LOL ok, limited to what? 100 million? I have yet to see any CDs once available that is not available any longer. I bought your gay content, and a few months later opend a gay TGP, guess what I saw...... I got to the point where I had to reject several galleries a day, not based on the quality, if thats what someone is using to try and make sales, then thats their choice, but because i was seeing the same images over and over.
Buying from pixmasters was a good learning experience. Now buy from Ounique, Cool Content, Garill and a few others when they get new gay content. Since I do movie sites, 5,000 images used as filler isn't bad. But Trev is right, bad quality, 50 pics of the guys taking off his shirt (I remove easily 25% of the images in any given set) and models that should be paying the photographer! There, that pretty much covers it.
spaz