Quote:
Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Jun 11 2003, 09:45 AM
Hey Lee,
Why not argue your case.....
don't you stand behyind this product.
I and many others, can be swayed by reasoned argument 
|
Hi'ya Nick,
It has been over 20 hours of fire on GFY, and we had no idea it would be so intense.
We developed the product and at least ASACP wants a subset of it, that alone made it worth it. Matter of fact DJ is on the phone with Joan Irvine as we speak. We have had multiple talks with Gary Kremen who was in the loop etc...
But we are not out trying to sell it per se door to door', we are making it available and adaptable to the needs of those that use it. If people like it fine, if not fine.
We are not exactly quitting our day jobs over Sniffy.
The criteria for the scrub will be determined by the client. When Lightspeed came out saying they use a script, and Lens adopted it the industry heckled more was needed than a URL sniffer. We of course monitored this behavior my Adult.com and Lightspeed, and thats about when we came out of development.
So we have this "Sniffer" but if it has no value its pointless. If it does, we develop onward. But, SniffyJr. is going to ASACP under the FBI umbrella and we want nothing to do with screening the CP images unless they cast a net over the entire Sniffy concept.
Our contribution to ASACP is free, money was not a motivator. But when we saw where some said we needed more "Sniff" we felt we could do this service.
Most important point is, this program is optional, you have choice, it by no means is a standard the industry should cast a net over and adopt as policy.
I am not going to re-hash the discussion found on GFY, now on page 2, but I do hope to place some perspective on this subject.