Clinton was an interesting man and a President that will go down in history as both great and terrible or maybe both (depending on your perspective).
What strikes me as funny are the people whose first reaction regarding the Chronology of Clinton is to assume that it must be negative and rush to defend and discredit, adding the YAWNS and all. Not that I didn't anticipate it as the sub title indicates.
Must be the idea that since I'm not a liberal, I must be on the other side. Just another conservative in Libertarian clothing, blah, blah, blah.
I was there and had some personal experiences with alot of the people involved with the Clintons, nothing more, nothing less. I had a great time when I was in Little Rock and it is just interesting to me to look back and see so many of the people that I knew involved at such a high level.
People who need to defend Clinton when he is not even being bashed, reference the same in other threads, etc. need to get a better grip on life.
It's not all about party politics. There are just too many of us who see the shit on both sides and find ourselves objectively in the middle rather than partisanly on one side or the other.
|