[Dianna Vesta]

.Ok this probably should be another thread but I've learn on Oprano that the subject line doesn't mean shit and a serious topic can easily become a pissing match or brain fry.

6 months ago I agreed that studio live were superior to home live. After all you have more control not only over equipment hardware, line connections, etc. but over what the performance of the girls… lol- or you should anyhow. I’ve watched many studio operations and to be honest with you most suck. Yea, they have a few girls that are hotties but the lie around wasting time just as much as they would be at home.

Today, after much research, I’m seeing solutions that make more sense on having a girl work at home. After all it reduces your overhead. I know at least a dozen women who would be great at niche but the idea of working in a studio makes their stomachs stir. After all, why should they? I’m really just opening this up for debate because I know a few of you here are doing live studios.

Then again a studio could be a house set up with one or two cams and the girls still running the show, right? So why wouldn’t you require a girl to 1) already have DSL 2) certain hardware requirements 3) offer a higher payout to girls who own the right hardware- lower for the first 8 months, etc. to girls who did not.

I also think that the girls working at home successfully, out promoting their shit, are far more serious as performers. The problem is that the programs out there are over saturated and there’s not enough traffic to go around… or is there?

Colin? Forrest? Gonzo are you actually running a live cam platform or just involved in the technical end?

Thanks