Quote:
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@May 3 2003, 10:14 PM
You can agree or disagree with it; or you can indulge in some pseudophilosophical semantics game about the existence of evil in a political context.
|
You think it's a "pseudophilosophical semantics game" for someone to ask you to define and explain a word or the context in which you are using it? It makes more sense for us to carry on a conversation if we don't understand what each other are saying rather than if we do? Isn't that the whole point? You are obviously very knowledgable about this subject and it would be interesting to hear you views but if you're going to insist on me not being able to ask "my so called questions", what's the point? That wouldnt be a thread, it'd be a blog.
Maybe it's patently obvious to you but I just don't get the idea of an entire political party being labeled as evil. The entire CONCEPT of anti-discrimination is not labelling the sum by it's parts. I don't see much of a difference in labelling people by their chose political party affiliation to an appalling ideology such as racism from labelling a jewish [religion] person as subversive. What next? Catholics are evil? Baptists are evil? Hindus are evil? Jews are evil?
Yes, I did read your post and I'm not accusing you of such. You are very careful in what you said. I wouldn't have known until I asked and I still don't understand what Dig means.
Is George Bush evil because Pat Robertson believes the Bible that homosexuals should be stoned at the city gates?