PornoDoggy: true. That’s what I meant. I got too annoyed from CNN and BBC interpertation of the "facts". There are many facts out there - its all about how/what you emphasis. Rumsfeld would indeed get all crazy if he saw it. The entire country is rid of Saddam and they go – “US troops brought looting and humanitarian crisis” – like everything was so golly good before.
Colin: hehe. True. Though O’riely doesn’t really claim what he says is always facts. A lot of times he say – we will wait and see who is right. He is crazy nonetheless
Danny: yep. People want to see what news medias give them – digested facts. Atleast Fox is not portraying the allied forces as more evil than the Iraqi old regime. I think that since we all agree news can not be totally objective - it is important to ALWAYS present things in perspective and references to the other side - they must not assume people already think that Saddam is bad and that we should now focus on the allied forces. They should always say things like: "Looting is going on in the streets, the museums were savagly destroyes. This is a shame. still - its much better than Saddam's mass rapes, execution in the streets and a regime that bought weapons with money that was intended for food to stop the starvation in Iraq."
|