[fraggle]

I understand what you are saying in a way but i think it is harsh and possibly swayed by a bit of propoganda (as we all are in a way) to say that because a country doesnt agree with US foreign policy. You could also argue that it is purely a means of protecting the integrity of the United Nations opinions.

I agree that Chirac is spending too much time arguing and less in diplomacy but i do respect that he is slowing the process up a little (which will not cause any problems) and may aid a diplomatic solution. Then again that coupled with the threat of war may also speed this process up!

Allot of people are worried as to the possible terrorist ramifications if there IS and attack on Iraq also which has to be considered.

As for the French in general i agree they do like to start power struggles/conflict (and they are very nationalistic) but, that is not to say that disagreeing is a bad thing. It simply opens up the debate more for rational discussion to find a mutually beneficial solution and better understanding.

I just think a little more discussion and evidence would serve us all a bit better before Europe splits on this - which can be done without reducing pressure on Hussain.