Quote:
Originally posted by Mike AI@Mar 7 2003, 11:43 AM
PD the modern peace movement for the most part is a fraud... they are people who have an agenda that is anti-American, anti-israel, professional protesters, kids looking for excuses to skip school, and other vagerants. There is no real wide spread movement....
I do not have a violent streak, but if any of these losers would spit on our troops coming back, I think I would be hard pressed not to re-arrange their faces.
Any anti-war protester who equates Bush to Hilter should be pimp slapped - it is an insult to history, to reality, and to those who suffered under Hilters oppression and murderous regime. IT amazes me that people will actually claim that Saddam is a nicer guy, less dangerous then Bush. THis is evidence of their bias, ignorance, and willingness to say anything to bash Bush and the US. It is intellectually dishonest... and proves they are FRAUDS!
|
Mike ... when you paint all antiwar protesters with the broad brush you just applied, you are being just as "intellectually dishonest" as they are, IMHO.
Anti-American? What do you mean by that? Some consider the mere act of questioning the need for this war as anti-American. Anti-Israeli? Again, what do you mean? Some contend that the mere suggestion that there are two sides that should be presented in a discussion of Middle-East issues are anti-semtic.
I don't doubt that there are anti-Americans involved with the peace movement. I don't doubt that there are some aggitating
for the war who have the interests of another nation in mind when they do so, either. I don't doubt that there are anti-semites involved in the anti-war movement either. And vagrants? Gimme a break, okay?
But for every one of them there are hundreds of ordinary Americans who don't happen to see things your way. Labelling them all into the various categories you do is no more intellectually credible than considering anyone who supports the war a capitalist, oil-poisoned war pig.