From ...
http://www.theposition.com/takingpositions...rn/default.shtm
The porno party of the Clinton years is ending and pornographers may be putting the sacrosanct "money shot" out to pasture. George W. Bush is sending out signals that battling pornography will be a key objective of his administration. After Bush's appointment of John Ashcroft, who had a history of prosecuting porn when he was Missouri Attorney General, porn industry insiders fear Bush is looking to appoint long-term anti-porn advocate, Bruce A Taylor, president of the National Law Center for Children and Families (NLC), to be Ashcroft's deputy Porn Czar. According to Inside.com, two other anti-porn warriors Bush is looking at for the post are Patrick Truman with the American Family Association, and J. Robert Flores of the NLC. ....
(Read the rest)
----------
Say Ashcroft and Taylor go after porn ..
What legislation would be effective? Would the Supreme Court nix anything like they did with CDA? Would the ACLU wield their hammers once again?
Is it technologically feasible?
Would the strongest still survive?
Would legislation be more user-end or distributer-ended and if distributor-ended, what could they do to stop one from setting up shop in Country X?
1. What is the worst that could happen?
2. What is the most likely thing that could happen? (Nothing, something, or everything) ?