Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   "New" 2257 Regs in a Nutshell (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=92781)

gonzo 12-19-2008 02:32 PM

"New" 2257 Regs in a Nutshell
 
The bullets below (courtesy of DoJ!) will give you an idea of the changes Justice has agreed to make.
  • Consolidated the publication of the final versions of the two proposed rules into one final rule;
  • Ensured that the regulatory requirements applicable to depictions of actualsexually explicit conduct consisting of lascivious exhibition apply starting on the date of availability of the statutorily provided safe harbor;
  • Permitted the use of third-party custodians of records;
  • Permitted records to be maintained digitally;
  • Clarified the exemption from the record-keeping requirements for those engaged in distribution;
  • Clarified that, for purposes of the requirement that every page of a webpage contain the disclosure statement, a hyperlink or “mouseover” is permitted;
  • Eliminated the requirement that statements on the location of records contain a date of production (or any other date), although added a requirement that primary producers create a record of the date of production;
  • Clarified the application of the requirements regarding location of the statement to DVDs; and
  • Eliminated the detailed information required by the certification regime, and replaced it with a significantly simpler certification.
Read more information and Tom's questions at http://www.xbiz.com/blogs/blog.php?b...=102982#102982

TheEnforcer 12-19-2008 03:51 PM

Re: "New" 2257 Regs in a Nutshell
 
Will be intersting to see the reaction to this....

Toby 12-19-2008 03:57 PM

Re: "New" 2257 Regs in a Nutshell
 
And still not a thing on the FSC web site. Not even a mention that the new regs have been released and are being reviewed.

RawAlex 12-19-2008 04:17 PM

Re: "New" 2257 Regs in a Nutshell
 
Gotta love this:

Quote:

DoJ also says that adult Tube sites "... may be exempt from keeping records, since the original individual producer who posts a depiction on that site is required to affix a disclosure notice to each page of the sexually explicit depiction..."
it's amazing that they still don't seem to know the difference between pages and videos / digital material. A flash movie can be played without a page, would that make it exempt from record keeping because it isn't on an actual page? Would every clip (video or otherwise) have to have a 2257 notice that is on the screen for the required 30 seconds or whatever it is to be read?

Also, define distribution - would a magazine be a primary producer, a secondary producer, or a distributor? What about a website publishing only sponsor content, or a blog only posting links and a single sample pic that points to sponsor content? Would every blog have to have a list of 2257 for every item it runs? Or are blogs just another distributor?

Banner ads? Hello?

If I put the word "tube" on a site, do I suddenly become exempt?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 AM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022