![]() |
US gives red light to 'porn zone'
The United States Government has blocked a plan to create a red-light district in cyberspace.
28 March 2006 By TOM PULLAR-STRECKER Icann, the worldwide body that manages the Internet, had been expected to approve website addresses ending in ".xxx" at an international meeting under way in Wellington, but it is understood it will not now vote on the proposal. http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3617963a13,00.html |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Well, I'm glad that's not going to happen. Though I think the US motives are less than pure, I still applaud the move.
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
I don't care why it doesn't happen as long as it doesn't.
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
Parent's need to use filters and accept that the internet is NOT a safe place for children. |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
imagine if Utah wanted to block porn, they would just flip a switch what about Alabama? flip a switch I do everything I can to make sure kids don't see anything xxx on my site, and I expect other site owners to do the same, but ultimately it all comes down to the parents doing their job I don't see them putting regulations on excitement magazine, anyone can pick one of those up on any street in Atlanta...and it has ass and titties all over it... |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
I assume those who want porn will find a way to get it. I just don't like the idea that all the places they are use to finding porn simply go away.
States are not going to ban peoples access to something that is legal by US law. The local isps may make you request it but the national isps would very likely be just the other way around. |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
I know, it is an extreme way to view things, but in all honesty, haven't the past 6 years showed us some extreme situations and abuses of the government? |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
if they are going to put all porn on one domain, then they need to put all white power shit on .kkk and all drug advocation sites on .drg
etc etc etc you can't single out one taboo thing and not follow with the rest, oh wait, you are the USA government, you can do what you want when you want, cause no one ever stands up and protests anymore |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Top level domains don't have to be altered for a hometown District Attorney to call something obscene. It use to happen all the time.. it may still be happening we just hear about it less.
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Let the record show I am 100% in favor of an .xxx domain and all porn being forced there
For my own selfish reason and of course it is impossible for that to happen |
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
Quote:
|
Re: US gives red light to 'porn zone'
"Mr Lawley said.xxx would provide adult Internet users with some assurance they could view pornography at websites run by "responsible adult entertainment providers" without encountering spyware and computer viruses."
Sorry but WHAT THE FUCK is this moron thinking???? .xxx automatically means no spyware or virii? What is this guy smoking??? Also, Google images has many sexually explicit images, will they be forced to put those on a google.xxx domain only? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022