UN at odds over internet's future

The report will be presented to Kofi Annan on 18 July
A UN group charged with deciding how the net should be run has failed to reach a decision.
The group's report suggests four possible futures for net governance that range from no change to complete overhaul.

The proposals will go forward to a key UN net and society conference due to take place in November.

The report comes as the US says it plans to keep its role as overseer of the net's core administrative body.

Tough choice

The Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) was set up after delegates to the UN's World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) failed to agree on how the net should be run.

Many of those attending the 2003 WSIS meeting in Geneva were happy with the current system in which the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann) oversees the running of the net's addressing system.

Others, particularly delegates from developing nations, resent Icann's role and the fact that the US has kept control of it.

Now the WGIG has issued its report about net governance and has tabled four possible futures for what should be done about policy issues, such as spam and hi-tech crime, that fall outside Icann's narrow technical remit.


Option One - create a UN body known as the Global Internet Council that draws its members from governments and "other stakeholders" and takes over the US oversight role of Icann.

Option Two - no changes apart from strengthening Icann's Governmental Advisory Committee to become a forum for official debate on net issues.

Option Three - relegate Icann to a narrow technical role and set up an International Internet Council that sits outside the UN. US loses oversight of Icann.

Option Four - create three new bodies. One to take over from Icann and look after the net's addressing system. One to be a debating chamber for governments, businesses and the public; and one to co-ordinate work on "internet-related public policy issues".
The one common aspect of all four proposals is the creation of some sort of talking shop that will give governments and others a say in how the net develops.

The four proposals will be sent forward to the second World Summit on the Information Society which is due to take place in Tunisia in November 2005 where delegates will pick their favourite option.

Whatever decision the conference reaches could provoke a clash with the US which in early July renewed its claim to oversee Icann's work.

Can I say

FUCK THE UN


Once more

It's of little surprise to me that something as far reaching as the net has many countries trying to stick their fingers in the pie. <_<

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... bureaucracy

Well - ICANN (the USA) is creating a .xxx TLD - I say that ICANN should be replaced just for that sad fact.

I believe one of the directors of new.net who are currently selling .xxx and have been for years is on the board of ICANN .. dont bother going there, as it installed some kind of software that is deemed a tracker by the antivirus stuff ;)

I believe one of the directors of new.net who are currently selling .xxx and have been for years is on the board of ICANN .. dont bother going there, as it installed some kind of software that is deemed a tracker by the antivirus stuff ;) [/b][/quote]
Lens says .XXX tld isnt really a bad thing.

I firmly believe that the internet should be taken out of US control. Let the UN setup a regulatory body I say.

Lens says .XXX tld isnt really a bad thing. [/b][/quote]
I feel so relieved.

You damn limey

The US controls (sorta for the most part) the internet and we've all made a good deal of money

Why do you want to fuck with that?

Let the US run things and everyone will be ok :)


ah ha ha ha ha ha



p.s. the UN is usless without the US, hell we host it for free in prime real estate

You damn limey

The US controls (sorta for the most part) the internet and we've all made a good deal of money

Why do you want to fuck with that?

Let the US run things and everyone will be ok :)


ah ha ha ha ha ha



p.s. the UN is usless without the US, hell we host it for free in prime real estate [/b][/quote]
hahahah

I don't mind the US hosting the UN at all, infact I thank you guys for it :)


I would just like to see ICANN removed or totally rebuilt and that'll only happen if the UN takes a hand in things.