Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   MasterCard International bans Extreme Content (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=40227)

Rolo 04-11-2005 10:19 AM

In 4 weeks from now MasterCard International will not allow sites that sell:

Extreme Sexual Violence
Rape
Bestiality
Snuff
Scat

I wonder if VISA International will follow...

Lee 04-11-2005 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rolo@Apr 11 2005, 06:20 AM
I wonder if VISA International will follow...
God i hope so.

Trev 04-11-2005 10:56 AM

Finally!

:angry:

Becki 04-11-2005 11:00 AM

I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<

Steady 04-11-2005 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Becki@Apr 11 2005, 07:01 AM
I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<
I agree!

Armstrong 04-11-2005 11:16 AM

Bout time! theres to much sick shit getting processed!! :grrr:

JoesHO 04-11-2005 11:26 AM

Will throat fucking and puking stuff be considered "extreme "

( not that I am into it LOL) I am just curious as to where the line is drawn, and how will Mastercard draw it ?

any news in tha regard?

Raven 04-11-2005 12:01 PM

As much as I dislike the content, it's censorship. Pure and simple.

And, yes, I know it's their playground.....and they can do what they want.....

Paul Markham 04-11-2005 12:36 PM

Bloody good job.

Sorry Raven but I'm not here for the politics I'm here to make money. As a guy who can shoot erotic stuff without abusing a woman or portraying women as toilets or objects to be used I would like them to ban even more.

It will not cost us 1 surfer, but clear out a lot of guys who can't tell porn from the arses.

Trev 04-11-2005 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul Markham@Apr 11 2005, 05:37 PM
Bloody good job.

Sorry Raven but I'm not here for the politics I'm here to make money. As a guy who can shoot erotic stuff without abusing a woman or portraying women as toilets or objects to be used I would like them to ban even more.

It will not cost us 1 surfer, but clear out a lot of guys who can't tell porn from the arses.

Paul I like your content, always does very nice for me :okthumb:

:)

StreetRacer 04-11-2005 12:43 PM

damn, where will i buy my bestiality porn now? :(

Trev 04-11-2005 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by StreetRacer@Apr 11 2005, 05:44 PM
damn, where will i buy my bestiality porn now? :(
Amsterdam :P

BillPMB 04-11-2005 12:45 PM

While I find that stuff abhorrant personally.

I am against censorship of any kind.

Lee 04-11-2005 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Raven@Apr 11 2005, 08:02 AM
As much as I dislike the content, it's censorship. Pure and simple.
I kinda agree but, at the same time, would you also not agree that it is upholding the LAW also?

Rolo 04-11-2005 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JoesHO1@Apr 11 2005, 07:27 AM
Will throat fucking and puking stuff be considered "extreme "

( not that I am into it LOL) I am just curious as to where the line is drawn, and how will Mastercard draw it ?

any news in tha regard?

This is hot off the press - the coming weeks will tell, which sites are allowed to still process MasterCard.

While MasterCard probably is 30-40% of the credit card transactions, then its still possible to process visa and ach on these sites, so they will not go away.

Rikk 04-11-2005 01:08 PM

This type of crud needs to be censored it's just plain wrong!

OldJeff 04-11-2005 01:42 PM

By what logic can anyone call this censorship ???

Nothing is being done to stop anyone from displaying anything.

MC is simply stating they want nothing to do with some extreme content.

Freedom of speech does not mean a credit card company has to supports someones profiting.

VISA and MC could stop processing for all adult material tomorrow and it would have nothing to do with censorship.

SykkBoy 04-11-2005 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 11 2005, 12:09 PM
This type of crud needs to be censored it's just plain wrong!
I agree
and next to be banned should be gay porn, anal sex, interracial, bukakke, group sex, old ladies and anything that isn't two poeple in love fucking in the missionary position (with genitals pixelated)

creams 04-11-2005 01:50 PM

Alot of people are very touchy about this type of content not being processed anymore -- I think a few of you are hiding some kinks!

:lol:

SykkBoy 04-11-2005 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by creams@Apr 11 2005, 12:51 PM
Alot of people are very touchy about this type of content not being processed anymore -- I think a few of you are hiding some kinks!

:lol:

it's no secret that I made my early money from beasty and so did a lot of "upstanding" members of this industry....hell, almost every linklist used to list beasty back in the day...the ONLY reason most stopped listing it was because other sponsors were getting pissy about having their links on the same page...I stopped because there was no processing and also because I came the decision I wouldn't pormote anything I wouldn't be willing to defend in a court of law in front of my children and family if I I so had to...

The problem comes with labelling content "extreme" where does that boundary extend to?

Almighty Colin 04-11-2005 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rolo@Apr 11 2005, 09:20 AM
In 4 weeks from now MasterCard International will not allow sites that sell:

Extreme Sexual Violence
Rape
Bestiality
Snuff
Scat

I wonder if VISA International will follow...

Blah. I disagree with most of you. These are draconian measures.

Ban people shitting on each other? Why?
Girls sucking off donkeys? Pretty entertaining. I'd pay to see that.
Sex and violence? Two of my favorite things. Now I can't combine them?!

Almighty Colin 04-11-2005 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Apr 11 2005, 12:48 PM
old ladies
Well .. ;-)

Nickatilynx 04-11-2005 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin+Apr 11 2005, 10:05 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Almighty Colin @ Apr 11 2005, 10:05 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Rolo@Apr 11 2005, 09:20 AM
In 4 weeks from now MasterCard International will not allow sites that sell:

Extreme Sexual Violence
Rape
Bestiality
Snuff
Scat

I wonder if VISA International will follow...

Blah. I disagree with most of you. These are draconian measures.

Ban people shitting on each other? Why?
Girls sucking off donkeys? Pretty entertaining. I'd pay to see that.
Sex and violence? Two of my favorite things. Now I can't combine them?! [/b][/quote]
I tend to agree with Colin. LOL

The only thing I'll newver touch is KP.

But even then , is 16 yr old girls KP?

Almighty Colin 04-11-2005 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Apr 11 2005, 01:08 PM
But even then , is 16 yr old girls KP?
Depends on how big her tits are.

SykkBoy 04-11-2005 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx+Apr 11 2005, 01:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nickatilynx @ Apr 11 2005, 01:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin@Apr 11 2005, 10:05 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Rolo
Quote:

@Apr 11 2005, 09:20 AM
In 4 weeks from now MasterCard International will not allow sites that sell:

Extreme Sexual Violence
Rape
Bestiality
Snuff
Scat

I wonder if VISA International will follow...


Blah. I disagree with most of you. These are draconian measures.

Ban people shitting on each other? Why?
Girls sucking off donkeys? Pretty entertaining. I'd pay to see that.
Sex and violence? Two of my favorite things. Now I can't combine them?!

I tend to agree with Colin. LOL

The only thing I'll newver touch is KP.

But even then , is 16 yr old girls KP? [/b][/quote]
you know if the age of consent for adult material were changed to 16 tomorrow, everyone and their brother would be tripping all over themselves to buy up sweet16yearoldpussy.com type domains, rushing out the "she just turned 16 yesterday" banners and scoping the highschools for fresh model meat...

SykkBoy 04-11-2005 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin+Apr 11 2005, 01:06 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Almighty Colin @ Apr 11 2005, 01:06 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Apr 11 2005, 12:48 PM
old ladies
Well .. ;-) [/b][/quote]
that would be one way to get my pictures off the net ;-)

PornoDoggy 04-11-2005 02:34 PM

In further developments, Mastercard has announced the formation of a committee to identify the content they will define as extreme.

Among those nominating individuals to serve on the committee are Tom Delay, Bill Frist, Orin Hatch, Phyllis Schafley ...

Pro_Zac 04-11-2005 02:34 PM

I see nothing wrong with the content!

It's not my jazz but everyone has their thing and if they'll pay for it even better.

The only things I'm not with is KP and Snuff, everything else is fair game.

runner 04-11-2005 03:06 PM

It dont hurt nun -- Unless your the one the horse is fuckin :blink:

Steady 04-11-2005 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by runner@Apr 11 2005, 11:07 AM
It dont hurt nun -- Unless your the one the horse is fuckin :blink:
Bingo!

As long as you're not on the receiving end!

Grump 04-12-2005 07:28 AM

The right wing in this country will be very happy to hear Rikk's comment: "This type of crud needs to be censored it's just plain wrong! ". Using this logic they will be able to argue to outlaw all porn.

People... are you really that unaware that the arguments you put out here against extreme content are the same ones used to try and close us all down? By people who think, just like many here, that their values and moral should outweigh those of others.

The extreme content is legal in many countries and why are your moral values superior to anyone else's?

This thread would give Jerry Falwell a stiffy.

Rikk 04-12-2005 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Grump@Apr 12 2005, 03:29 AM
The right wing in this country will be very happy to hear Rikk's comment: "This type of crud needs to be censored it's just plain wrong! ". Using this logic they will be able to argue to outlaw all porn.

People... are you really that unaware that the arguments you put out here against extreme content are the same ones used to try and close us all down? By people who think, just like many here, that their values and moral should outweigh those of others.

The extreme content is legal in many countries and why are your moral values superior to anyone else's?

This thread would give Jerry Falwell a stiffy.

I stand by my opinion that its discusting!

:angry:

slavdogg 04-12-2005 09:38 AM

Can i buy Bestiality and Scat videos in Amsterdam with my MasterCard ?

Grump 04-12-2005 09:55 AM

Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.

Rikk 04-12-2005 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Grump@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.
Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:

SykkBoy 04-12-2005 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk+Apr 12 2005, 10:27 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rikk @ Apr 12 2005, 10:27 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Grump@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.
Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink: [/b][/quote]
my grandmother used to have the same argument over any depictions of people in swimsuits.....luckily she was the industry's moral barometer

SykkBoy 04-12-2005 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Paul Markham@Apr 11 2005, 11:37 AM
Bloody good job.

Sorry Raven but I'm not here for the politics I'm here to make money. As a guy who can shoot erotic stuff without abusing a woman or portraying women as toilets or objects to be used I would like them to ban even more.

It will not cost us 1 surfer, but clear out a lot of guys who can't tell porn from the arses.

ah, here we go again
Paul, you really have no grounds for a moral complex...
your "my porn is holier than your porn" shit won't fly here, mate, this isn't GFY...

maybe after they've cleaned up the extreme people, theyc an focus on you...there are a lot of people who take issue with what you do...take 18 and 19 year old girls in Eastern Europe and exploit their need for money and lack of a job situation. face it, we're in an exploitative business...there are some right wingers who feel what YOU do is the same as treating a woman as an object and as a toilet...perhaps they are right too?

Just because you use better lighting, it doesn't make you a better pornographer...

Rikk 04-12-2005 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy+Apr 12 2005, 07:34 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Apr 12 2005, 07:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 12 2005, 10:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Grump
Quote:

@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.


Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:

my grandmother used to have the same argument over any depictions of people in swimsuits.....luckily she was the industry's moral barometer [/b][/quote]
Did your gradma ever see your avatar :blink:

SykkBoy 04-12-2005 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk+Apr 12 2005, 10:39 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rikk @ Apr 12 2005, 10:39 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Apr 12 2005, 07:34 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 12 2005, 10:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Grump

Quote:

Quote:

@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.


Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:


my grandmother used to have the same argument over any depictions of people in swimsuits.....luckily she was the industry's moral barometer

Did your gradma ever see your avatar :blink: [/b][/quote]
who do you think first introdsuced me to the movie it was from? ;-)

Becki 04-12-2005 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy+Apr 12 2005, 07:40 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Apr 12 2005, 07:40 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 12 2005, 10:39 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Apr 12 2005, 07:34 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 12 2005, 10:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Grump


Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.


Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:


my grandmother used to have the same argument over any depictions of people in swimsuits.....luckily she was the industry's moral barometer


Did your gradma ever see your avatar :blink:

who do you think first introdsuced me to the movie it was from? ;-) [/b][/quote]
Your Gran sounds like a real mean momma :yowsa:


:agrin:

gonzo 04-12-2005 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Apr 12 2005, 10:38 AM
Just because you use better lighting, it doesn't make you a better pornographer...
:pearl:

Nickatilynx 04-12-2005 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy+Apr 12 2005, 07:38 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Apr 12 2005, 07:38 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Paul Markham@Apr 11 2005, 11:37 AM
Bloody good job.

Sorry Raven but I'm not here for the politics I'm here to make money. As a guy who can shoot erotic stuff without abusing a woman or portraying women as toilets or objects to be used I would like them to ban even more.

It will not cost us 1 surfer, but clear out a lot of guys who can't tell porn from the arses.

ah, here we go again
Paul, you really have no grounds for a moral complex...
your "my porn is holier than your porn" shit won't fly here, mate, this isn't GFY...

maybe after they've cleaned up the extreme people, theyc an focus on you...there are a lot of people who take issue with what you do...take 18 and 19 year old girls in Eastern Europe and exploit their need for money and lack of a job situation. face it, we're in an exploitative business...there are some right wingers who feel what YOU do is the same as treating a woman as an object and as a toilet...perhaps they are right too?

Just because you use better lighting, it doesn't make you a better pornographer... [/b][/quote]
Good post Sykk.

Paul Markham you really are a sanctimonious fuck.

Almighty Colin 04-12-2005 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy+Apr 11 2005, 01:24 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Apr 11 2005, 01:24 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin@Apr 11 2005, 01:06 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy
Quote:

@Apr 11 2005, 12:48 PM
old ladies


Well .. ;-)

that would be one way to get my pictures off the net ;-) [/b][/quote]
And your mom!

Grump 04-12-2005 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk+Apr 12 2005, 11:27 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rikk @ Apr 12 2005, 11:27 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Grump@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.
Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:[/b][/quote]
I think that we should each make our own decision about what we view or find erotic and not try to influence others' rights to do the same. Censorship does just that, it removes the individual's rights and places them with someone else. That, is wrong.

Almighty Colin 04-12-2005 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Apr 12 2005, 10:38 AM
Just because you use better lighting, it doesn't make you a better pornographer...
How about some role-playing talk?

Pornography is in the eye of the beholder

Almighty Colin 04-12-2005 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Grump+Apr 12 2005, 01:10 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Grump @ Apr 12 2005, 01:10 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Rikk@Apr 12 2005, 11:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Grump
Quote:

@Apr 12 2005, 05:56 AM
Rikk, "disgusting" sure... thats not a problem. "Should be censored" is another thing entirely.


Censored isn't the word I should have used. Even though this kind of thing is legal in some countries doesnt mean that its right, or does it :o :blink:

I think that we should each make our own decision about what we view or find erotic and not try to influence others' rights to do the same. Censorship does just that, it removes the individual's rights and places them with someone else. That, is wrong. [/b][/quote]
Fuck erotic. Sheep fucking isn't erotic but I do find it interesting to watch. I mean, come on, how can you NOT be interested in seeing a guy fuck a sheep? The first thing I heard about the web was "Have you heard about the world wide web? You can see a girl sucking a donkey's dick on there".

I'll bring the sheep. Paul, bring the lights. Sykkboy, bring your cock!

Almighty Colin 04-12-2005 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Becki@Apr 11 2005, 10:01 AM
I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<
Have you EVER seen a bestiality pic or movie?

Becki 04-12-2005 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin+Apr 12 2005, 10:16 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Almighty Colin @ Apr 12 2005, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Becki@Apr 11 2005, 10:01 AM
I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<
Have you EVER seen a bestiality pic or movie? [/b][/quote]
I have, I saw animal farm when I was younger and it didn't flick any switches for me!

rendh 04-12-2005 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin+Apr 12 2005, 10:16 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Almighty Colin @ Apr 12 2005, 10:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Becki@Apr 11 2005, 10:01 AM
I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<
Have you EVER seen a bestiality pic or movie? [/b][/quote]
What does it matter if she has or has not?

I know that a guy shoving a pigs cock up his ass is something that I don't want to see even without seeing it!

Nickatilynx 04-12-2005 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rendh+Apr 12 2005, 10:46 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (rendh @ Apr 12 2005, 10:46 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin@Apr 12 2005, 10:16 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Becki
Quote:

@Apr 11 2005, 10:01 AM
I think it's a disgrace that anything like that had processing at all! <_<


Have you EVER seen a bestiality pic or movie?

What does it matter if she has or has not?

I know that a guy shoving a pigs cock up his ass is something that I don't want to see even without seeing it! [/b][/quote]
Awwww go on with ya !!!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022