A new hat

http://dontblamemeivoted4kerry.com/s...kerry_cap1.jpg


There is a whole website of cool gifts for those who are having a hard time accepting defeat.

http://dontblamemeivoted4kerry.com/shopsit...html/index.html

Mike,
you are a flip flopper and you know it!

But you are in a good company:
Gerorge Washington, Kerry and me are flip floppers too!
;-)))

hey, there's nothing wrong with flipflops, I where then all the time at the beach

: ))

HAHA putting George Washington and Kerry in same post almost made my head explode!

Nice try!

http://dontblamemeivoted4kerry.com/s...pow%20copy.jpg

HAHA putting George Washington and Kerry in same post almost made my head explode!

Nice try!

http://dontblamemeivoted4kerry.com/s...pow%20copy.jpg [/b][/quote]
why?
Because one BETRAYED the oath given to the Crown and one only did it ALLEGEDLY?
;-)))

MikeAI, Dantheman and even you in stealth mode Peaches,
was George Washington a flip flopper and a traitor or was he not????

Yes or No??

No doubt George Washington was a flip flopper.... Heck his actions as a commander for the British during the French/Indian war helped lead directly to the Revolution.

Luckily George made the right decisions....

:salute:

very good, FINALLY!

we getting SOMEWHERE!!!!

Being a "flip flopper", the label Bush put on Kerry, is not such a bad thing as he tried to portray it,
isn't it???

flipfloping is one thing,Hell I flipflop just this morning, I was going to have a hardees biscut then decided to have a PBJ instead: ))

did washington ever meet with the enemy to aid them in thier war against us?

very good, FINALLY!

we getting SOMEWHERE!!!!

Being a "flip flopper", the label Bush put on Kerry, is not such a bad thing as he tried to portray it,
isn't it??? [/b][/quote]


To compare Washington to Kerry is silly.

Even if you consider Washington's flip flop from the crown ( pretty much the whole country flip flopped - plus I would argue it was merely a FLIP and not a flop since he did not try to go back -)

The essence of a flip flopper is to bounce back and forth on issues, based not on beleifs but on polling data and what is popular.

If Dean had not been so successful running as an anti-war candidate and forcing Kerry to out flank him, we would probably not be discussing this.

So blame Dean!

:lol:

Dan, are you a moron????

George Washington plead alligance to the British Crown,
under Oath!
and...he betrayed the Crown, rebelled against it and caused the Crown to lose it's colony!

To put it in layman's terms,
it's like your commanding officer
(you had one, haven't you)
told you to turn around 180 degrees and shoot your fellow soldiers!

Would you still look for exciuses????

Repeat after me for all future references:

George Washington was a tritor and the biggest flip flopper The Crown ever had in Americas!

he couldn't go back and "flop" even if he wanted....there was a price on his head and he'd be hanged by the Crown if he even attempted to "flop"
;-)))

serge, you should be very happy that washington(and the colonies) had the balls to decide and do what he needed to do back then. Can you imagine what this country would be still under the rule of the "crown"

Hell, you might still be in mother russia
; )))


comparing kerry and Washington is prolly one of the biggest stretches that I have seen yet from anyone...........I really think you are delusional. But I have faith you'll be ok

: )))

Dan,
I can be delusional, but I am not either blind or have my brain filled to capacity.


The conversation is useless with you,
unless you accept the obvious and repeat after me:
George Washington was a traitor.

I have no time to waste on people who as a good book says:

"5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:

6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:"

I am not God, I have much less pacience
;-)))

Serge...

people have no perspective..

Washington was a traitor , and a terrorist to Britain.And a freedom fighter.

Arafat was both a traitor and a freedom fighter..

no perspective...

blinkered

closed minds...

he saw what he needed to do and put together a small army and kicked the crowns ass.

he saw what he needed to do and sent kids with bombs straped to themselfs to kill civilins.


oh, yeah I can REALLY see the similarities

Dan ,

Washingtons "army" had troops as young as 12.

He gave them guns.

Dan,
you mind opening is smaller than a sperm,
and I am not talking whales...


How does it feel to live without a SINGLE thought of your own?

Dan ,

Washingtons "army" had troops as young as 12.

He gave them guns. [/b][/quote]
damn, is that the best you can do? of course he had to use some younger guys to kick the crowns ass. The Crown WAS the army of the day, massive military that covered the world. All he had was a few thousand untrained men that had the guts to fight for what they believed in.

Army against Army....................guess who won : ))))

now, what does that have to do with arafat sending kids out with bombs straped to themselfs into a resturant full of CIVILIANS?


come on guys, there's gota be more websites that ya'll can find to keep this going, maybe ya'll can find some similarities between stalin and Lincoln

: ))

Dan,
the difference between you and me is:
I don't need the websites,
I am capable of independent thinking process...

..and this si the #1 reason why you'll never live in my house
;-)))

it sounds like the same ole stuff I hear from most everyone that's mad,pissed,upset, angry that kerry lost.

you right, I'll never live in your house, it's not on the water : ))

also Dan as one that , rightly , is proud of military service.

During the war of indepence the militia forces in the South used concealment, surprise, and other guerrilla tactics to much advantage against the British and loyalist forces.

The tactics they used are commonly called asymmetric warfare.

Asymetric warfare is a term describing the tactics used when two forces of unequal strength meet and the weeker must resort to "guerilla" tactics.

Asymmetric warfare is increasingly referred to as "terrorism" by the superior military force enduring these tactics.

Therefore by Military definition George Washington was a terrorist.

Thank you very much...come again :)

Nick, we are wasting our time..

Dan's brain reached it's capacity about 24 months ago..

One can';t put 2 pounds of shit in a one pound bag
;-))))

ok Mr Kerry....I mean Mr Nick :) There's still a huge difference in guerilla warfare against another army and suicide bombers against Civilians.
dont ya think?

: ))

Dan,
the wife of a British Military Officer, is she civilian or not?

I've got run for now,wouldnt want ya'll to waste this valuable debate on little ole me:)

I'm heading over to the LSU board and fuck with them some
:))



ROLL TIDE! :rokk:

Dan,
the wife of a British Military Officer, is she civilian or not? [/b][/quote]
yeah she is I guess, depends on her role, did Washington send a 13 year old boy to her house with 500 lbs of explosives straped to his chest?!?

yeah she is I guess, depends on her role, did Washington send a 13 year old boy to her house with 500 lbs of explosives straped to his chest?!? [/b][/quote]
no, he didn't, but Menahem Begin,
who preceeded Arafat in Palestine, before becoming PM of Israel,
did:
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/bombi...david_hotel.htm

Is Manahem Begin terrorist?

Do you know who was Menahem Begin?

Good idea , Dan :)

It is far better to leave and be thought a fool , than remain and post , and remove all doubt. :)


;-))))

no, he didn't, but Menahem Begin,
who preceeded Arafat in Palestine, before becoming PM of Israel,
did:
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/bombi...david_hotel.htm

Is Manahem Begin terrorist?

Do you know who was Menahem Begin? [/b][/quote]
looks to me like he's nothing but a terrorist, but then again, I'm not a expert on middle east affairs whatsoever. I do know that when you have to target civilins to get your point across, all you do is make your battle harder to win in the long run.



thanks nick, coming from you that means somthing : )))

"" I do know that when you have to target civilins to get your point across, all you do is make your battle harder to win in the long run""

gee you mean like "Lynching" - named after a Col Lynch who in the war of Independence "lynched" civilian loyalists?

Or the common practice of tarring and feathering ( an action designed to...errr..oh yeah spread terror) loyalist Civilians.

ok, I grant it to you, you are not an expert in terrorists, you are a former military man and probably know the answer to
how calls the US Army members responcible for the lives of civilians during the Vietnam War?

Nick, the village called, they want you to come back

:))

the village in Vietnam obliterated by US armed forces?

the village in Vietnam obliterated by US armed forces? [/b][/quote]
oh shit, Mr kerry is in the HOUSE

: )))

oh shit, Mr kerry is in the HOUSE

: ))) [/b][/quote]
Dan,
there is a huge black spot on your back with hairs growing from it.

Serge, we never, never, never obliterated any villages in Vietnam.

Sometimes we destroyed them in order to save them, though.

PD,
I know, I know,
we did it under duress from American Liberals who insisted that human occupants interferred with rare plants
;-)))

ya'll know as much about what we did in 'nam as Kerry did/does

; ))))

sure, sure, Dan,
you are the outmost authority on what went on in Vietnam...
you and Ho-shi-min
;-)))

Oh, gee, Danny ... I think I know quite a little bit about what we did in 'Nam.

I will admit freely to you that I don't accept the premise that the left and the media served the role some attributed to the Jews in Germany during World War I.

sure, sure, Dan,
you are the outmost authority on what went on in Vietnam...
you and Ho-shi-min
;-))) [/b][/quote]
damn serge, you have me mistaken for sen kerry


: ))))

damn serge, you have me mistaken for sen kerry


: )))) [/b][/quote]
oh no, you are the one who has mistaken himself for General Westmorland
;-)))

There's one thing missing in this thread....MikeAI....I'm sure Dan would appreciate the support! :biglaugh: