Oprano Adult Industry Forums - N. Korea ‘making atomic bombs’

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)

- Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)

- - N. Korea ‘making atomic bombs’ (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=31321)

Almighty Colin

10-02-2003 04:24 AM

Pyongyang up the yin yang. Now say they are finished reprocessing
spent nuclear fuel rods and are now making weapons.

What next?

JR	10-02-2003 05:38 AM

they announced at the last summit that they were going to test a bomb.

i think they should.

the end of the Cold War was really anticlimactic. i feel the world owes me one nuclear armegeddon for all the sleepless nights i had in junior high.

Winetalk.com

10-02-2003 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin@Oct 2 2003, 03:32 AM
Pyongyang up the yin yang. Now say they are finished reprocessing
spent nuclear fuel rods and are now making weapons.

What next?

Iran is NEXT....

Bex	10-02-2003 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Oct 2 2003, 02:08 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Oct 2 2003, 02:08 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Colin@Oct 2 2003, 03:32 AM
Pyongyang up the yin yang. Now say they are finished reprocessing
spent nuclear fuel rods and are now making weapons.

What next?

Iran is NEXT....[/b][/quote]
Likely .. I don't think they are too happy with Syria either. But they wouldn't put up any fight anyhow. Not that Iran would be a huge challenge.

SykkBoy

10-02-2003 02:21 PM

I find this interesting...we've been all over Saddam's jock about having WMD and here is North Korea touting the fact they have the bomb and they've mentioned before they'd use it and we don't seem as concerned...

maybe if North Korea had a lot of oil...or if there were some post-strike cleanup/re-construction jobs for Haliburton...........

Almighty Colin

10-02-2003 02:36 PM

Quote:

I think Bush has spent an enormous amount of political capital on Iraq.

Without finding WMD's, pre-emption is probably dead.

Almighty Colin

10-02-2003 02:36 PM

Also $ and China.

PornoDoggy

10-02-2003 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Oct 2 2003, 01:29 PM
I find this interesting...we've been all over Saddam's jock about having WMD and here is North Korea touting the fact they have the bomb and they've mentioned before they'd use it and we don't seem as concerned...

maybe if North Korea had a lot of oil...or if there were some post-strike cleanup/re-construction jobs for Haliburton...........

I don't think it's oil at all. I think it's the lack of viable tactical options.

Almighty Colin

10-02-2003 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 2 2003, 01:52 PM
I don't think it's oil at all. I think it's the lack of viable tactical options.

Yeah, it's not easy to drop 4 infantry divisions into South Korea w/o Kim Jong Il getting a little suspicious.

Last edited by Colin at Oct 2 2003, 01:59 PM

PornoDoggy

10-02-2003 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin+Oct 2 2003, 01:59 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Colin @ Oct 2 2003, 01:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--PornoDoggy@Oct 2 2003, 01:52 PM
I don't think it's oil at all. I think it's the lack of viable tactical options.

Yeah, it's not easy to drop 4 infantry divisions into South Korea w/o Kim Jong Il getting a little suspicious.[/b][/quote]
There's that ... and the whole annoying PR problem of the number of South Koreans that would be killed off in the event of war.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM..