Im sure there will be some people that say this means nothing,
but honestly, this is HUGE.
This is an email sent to us confirming the resignation of Steve
Workman from NetMgt.

From: sww@netmgt.com
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:06 AM
To: jjb1@netmgt.com
Cc: rcahan@becker-poliakoff.com; lsamuels@bergersingerman.com;
peter.goddard@atctrust.ky
Subject: resignation

I hereby tender my resignation.

I'll remain available to assist in transition of matters, if desired.

Thank you for your courtesies.

Steve

How does anyone know what it means? There is no reason why he resigned in his e-mail. Speculation?

MikeAI,
put 1+1 together,
I don't have time, you can do it.

Yeah... and the rest of the story........ What does it signify that makes it so huge Voodoo?

I heard he just wants to spend more quality time with the family :groucho:

Opti,
is there an australian expression equivalent of
"betting on the wrong horse"?

or

"Pissing against the wind"?
;-))

If only I could leak everything, instead of bits and pieces.

hehehe Serge... I may look silly... but I aint touching that one with a 40ft pole :moon:



Hey Voodoo... Want ultimate justice - Judge Judy Justice? Here's your chance.



(Before labret jumps down my throat for plaugerism.. I saw the link on gfy but it just fits so well that I had to post it)

Hey thats crap Voodooman!

Once you start talking you give up your right to stop and only give part of the story! Spill it baby.... we won't tell anyone ;-))

He knows what was done was wrong, Period.

This is not speculation, it is fact.

not here, this is Oprano...where reputation matters, this si not GFY for crissake
;-)))

but...it's you God's given right to look any way you want..

hahaha, nice, but problem with JJ is, she is small time compared
to this.

Hey thats crap Voodooman!

Once you start talking you give up your right to stop and only give part of the story! Spill it baby.... we won't tell anyone ;-))[/b][/quote]
Im sworn to partial privacy, therefore retain my rights to
start and stop whenever.

:P

He knows what was done was wrong, Period.

This is not speculation, it is fact.[/b][/quote]


Voodoo I understand your posistion, but to US it is speculation at this time.... nothing more.

Many lawyers do not have the ability to tell right from wrong....

:D

Pearl

Then it wouldn't be a leak........................


it would be a deluge....................



:yowsa:

edited the pearl to maintain accuracy.........





:yowsa:

Mike

I understand, and totally agree with you.

not here, this is Oprano...where reputation matters, this si not GFY for crissake
;-)))

but...it's you God's given right to look any way you want..[/b][/quote]
keyword=May ;-)

and since when did looks count anyway!?! (thank god)


I've heard of being under your woman's thumb but you are going very soft Voodoo ;-)))

This is Joee.... Steve Workman called me last night and aplogized for everything he helped Bennett and Fabian do to me. He resigned NetMgt because of the fraud that Bennett has been doing with fnancials , tax evasion and diversion of corporate opportunities. he has rolled on Bennett and Fabian and has told the truth about Bridget Shaw. For those of you that were brave(foolish) enough to go to Arizona for TCG3 gathering, the FBI and IRS were there. They have been looking over our industry since the days of Crescent Publishing. I know whom , when and where the fall is going to happen. Govern yourselves accordingly. pay your taxes, bring your shit on shore , and stay away from Rob Gould, Bennett and Fabian Buys. I have not decided if I want NetManagement back or if I just want to stay with ICE and PrivateGold, Tourist Hunter and work on my new IceChannels.... This biz has been a rude awakening in my life of how greedy and manipulative people are towards each other. The jealousy and theft are astonishing..... I might decide to run the whole industry throough the IRS or I moght just retire. Stay true to your morals and ethics. I have been paing webmasters fairly since 1996 and have had mail order intrnet related businesses since 1985. This shit has gone down hill, money is NOT everything(unless you do not have it you say?) money is the root of all evil and people like Bennett have ruined the industry by slamming credit cards in foreign countries, by diverting half of the traffic towards rapidblaster and other entities without your knowledge. Wake the fuck up!!!!!!:-))))

:salute:

Hey Joe, looks like you might finally get your justice after all. Is it too early for congratulations?

What industry isn't.........

This is far from confined to the adult industry or the adult web......

That is business in this world in general...........




:unsure:

this run through is probably going to happen all by itself.. I know back when the IRS froze all my accounts and blocked my paychecks, of all the people that pay(ed) me at the time, they had the shadiest, most questionable dealings with NetMgt - and that's from my collection agent's mouth (and his group manager), not mine.

the IRS isn't fond of grey areas and they don't like questions they can't readily answer..

they're no different than the religious right, credit card companies or anyone else in that line... they want to give this industry an enema in the worst way..

LOL.. If you wanted to scare the shit out of people... good job Joe! :okthumb: But I hope you don't mean that line about running the whole industry through the IRS the way it sounds!!!

I thought rapidblaster was a virus like application that keeps re-installing itself and is used to spawn popups or to have a dialer make a call without surfer interaction... how do they redirect traffic to it Joe? Do you mean they are forcing rapidblaster downloads on surfers we send?

That shit would get them closed down by nightfall I would have thought.. gov is nice and hot for "virus" distributors right now.

For some reason I have a hard time beleiving all of this.

Workman possibly is a scumbag, but he is not stupid. There is something called client/attorney priviledge. To change teams midstream would be the worst thing he could do to his own posistion.

Sure its nice to think that Workman had a change of heart, converted over and apologized.... it just ignored ANOTHER fact about attorneys. They have NO hearts, and the surely have no concept of guilt. Attorneys can justify and rationalize ANYTHING!

What I see is just some messages posted on a message board.... nothing more, nothing less.

For some reason I have a hard time beleiving all of this.

Workman possibly is a scumbag, but he is not stupid. There is something called client/attorney priviledge. To change teams midstream would be the worst thing he could do to his own posistion.

Sure its nice to think that Workman had a change of heart, converted over and apologized.... it just ignored ANOTHER fact about attorneys. They have NO hearts, and the surely have no concept of guilt. Attorneys can justify and rationalize ANYTHING!

What I see is just some messages posted on a message board.... nothing more, nothing less.[/b][/quote]
Mike,

I said this same thing right after Joe hung up the phone with Steve.

I told Joe, Steve isnt an idiot, and then I reflected on the past
proof and came to the conclusion, no, he isnt an idiot, just
mislead, and at the time, drivin by greed and $$$.

This has all come to a halt now that the opposition sees
that Joe is more determined than ever to get what was
and is rightfully his.

Im not here to try to convince anyone to take sides, Im
just trying to relay the truth, and thats it.

For some reason I have a hard time beleiving all of this.

Workman possibly is a scumbag, but he is not stupid. There is something called client/attorney priviledge. To change teams midstream would be the worst thing he could do to his own posistion.

Sure its nice to think that Workman had a change of heart, converted over and apologized.... it just ignored ANOTHER fact about attorneys. They have NO hearts, and the surely have no concept of guilt. Attorneys can justify and rationalize ANYTHING!

What I see is just some messages posted on a message board.... nothing more, nothing less.[/b][/quote]
One more thing, you can't really have attorney/client priviledge when
the said attorney, isnt really an attorney at all.

One more thing, you can't really have attorney/client priviledge when
the said attorney, isnt really an attorney at all.[/b][/quote]
yeah that would pretty much make it mute :)


hey joe, good to see ya posting and looks like good things are a happening :)

[I'm just lurking and reading ...]
[Going to do what I should have done on GFY .... when I first entered that forum ...just read for a month ... and STFU ...]

obviously you dont take your own advice too well! please dont spew your crap over here then way you do gfy. i do believe that this board has a far less tolarance level then gfy when it comes to your crap about sex, kids and the like.

take my advise for what it is-a forewarning

Advice noted.
On GFY it is a ffa ...
I come to this board to debate issues.

I've never been to a board like GFY ...
I quickly adapted to the cursing, swearing, and down right BS, as well as the slander and libelous statements.

It appears this board is not like that.

I look forward to healthy debate - if you call my opinions "spewing" ...so be it we can agree to disagree.

Advice noted.
On GFY it is a ffa ...
I come to this board to debate issues.

I've never been to a board like GFY ...
I quickly adapted to the cursing, swearing, and down right BS, as well as the slander and libelous statements.

It appears this board is not like that.

I look forward to healthy debate - if you call my opinions "spewing" ...so be it we can agree to disagree.[/b][/quote]
....all I got to say is look out cuz the freaks are loose.

Wait till he starts his survey about exchange of bodily fluids and exposed arroused genetalia.

bad enough this business has jaded me to the point of being a nun, i most certainly dont want to read about something i look at weekly :awinky:

My favorite was how he. supposedly male, told me, supposedly female :awinky: , how I and every other female was incapable of having anything except a clitoral orgasm. :blink: Apparently I've been faking it to myself, lol!

My favorite was how he. supposedly male, told me, supposedly female :awinky: , how I and every other female was incapable of having anything except a clitoral orgasm. :blink: Apparently I've been faking it to myself, lol![/b][/quote]
Whos your Daddy?

I want to know what cj thinks about all this!!!

B)

My favorite was how he. supposedly male, told me, supposedly female :awinky: , how I and every other female was incapable of having anything except a clitoral orgasm. :blink: Apparently I've been faking it to myself, lol![/b][/quote]
doesnt that suck when someone tells you the way you have been getting off for years is all wrong (especially since that someone is a few lithiums short of a padded room) and now you have to find a new way! hehehehe

gotta love it when a guy (no offense guys) thinks he knows more about a woman's body and what makes her tick, then a woman does. hell, a portion of the time most women dont even know but leave it to a guy (again, no offense) to think he's omniscient!

CJ, come out and play! JoeE is back. Voodooman, help JoeE register his own username. You are too good of a guy to act as his frontman. :rokk:

JoeE Doesnt need help reg'ing his own username, and
as I have mentioned before, I dont mind doing what
Im doing because Its my opinion and belief that he was screwed
out of his business.
Thanks for your concern, but I actually enjoy watching people
that fuck people get the blunt end of Karma.

Idiot.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

The statement there should be "No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name" is not a survey and is what the vast majority of adults agree should occur.

Do your own "survey" to confirm it to yourself ...
I already know that truth.
It's just common sence as well.

Yes I am well aware of the controversy of the statement that "Vaginal orgasm is a lie" causes, especially with women who have been "faking" it for years, and I am not saying you personally are faking it.

However, my concise statement of the facts - "Vaginal orgasm is a lie" is based upon a number of increasing UNIVERSITY websites.
SEE: http://DADSDESK.blogspot.com for the most recent three.

Where the vast majority of people believe something to be true - but for the vast majority of people it does not occur - THAT IS A LIE!
The vast majority of partner sex couples believe that penis only insertion stimulation of the vaginal walls will result in orgasm - when factually that does NOT occur for the vast majority of women.

All the other website can use as much "flowerery" & "politically correct" wording and terminology they wish. I wish to TERMINATE the lie. Vaginal orgasm is a lie - is concise - accurate and terminates the myth. My job as the current webmaster of SexEducation.com is to invoke intercourse which disseminates sexual truth and NOT sexual agendas. The truth. "Vaginal orgasm is a a lie" - does that quite well.

Are you saying this well respected Doctor and this quote is lie as well?
The adult industry is partially responsible for creating this myth.

I fully intend to plant the seeds of truth into it - by the posts I make.

Vaginal orgasm is a lie.
There is more then enough scientific evidence to support it.
It is just a matter of who has the guts to publically start calling it a lie.
Well guess what ? I do.
Have at it.

GREAT NEWS!!!!

Hurry now and grab this hot, sexy real estate today - sure to be a winnah!!! :yowsa:

You're just not doing it right. :)

Hit me on icq of email if you need help young grasshopper.



Last edited by Hooper at Sep 15 2003, 04:41 PM

Well, my body thinks it's having an orgasm vaginally and other ways, so if my body's faking it, then that's OK with me, lol!

Stop trying to talk about something you know NOTHING about. :ph34r:

ive never had a vaginal orgasam

:(

good god man! what the fuck happened to you? you rolled the "i need a conspiracy to champion" dice and crapped out with "vaginal orgasms are a lie"?

what the fuck is that about? you "have the guts" to start calling it a lie? thats like proclaiming "i have the guts to drink a glass of water"

go read a good book about crop circles or JFK and find yourself a respectable conspiracy to babble about... you are embarrassing yourself and others.

:rolleyes:

The scientific method says that a theory is valid until proven wrong....

It can proven right millions of times, but if it is proven wrong once, then it is an invalid theory....

While a valid theory may not always be true... An invalid theory is never true...

So, since you like "science" so much, let's apply the scientific method to your statement....

postulated:
"Vaginal orgasm is a lie."

Peaches has had a vaginal orgasm (according to her own testimony right here and you did not refute it, in fact you stated "Yes I am well aware of the controversy of the statement that Vaginal orgasm is a lie causes, especially with women who have been faking it for years, and I am not saying you personally are faking it.

As you are admitting that she may not be faking it, and I Double dog dare you to call peaches a liar, then you are admitting that she may be capable of vaginal orgasm.

Therefore, your statement has been proven wrong once and therefore your statement is invalid. Since an invalid theory can never be true, your statement is false. End of story.

If you would like to back off your high horse and state that "for the majority of women, a vaginal orgasm is an unknown pleasure", then you might gain some creedence...

Till then, learn some science.....





:yowsa:



Last edited by sarettah at Sep 15 2003, 05:31 PM

btw... what the hell does all this bodily fluids and engorged reproductive organs not having orgasms have to do with JoeE's and Voodoo's pots....


Count on Oprano for the strangest spins on threads.......


:blink:

doesn't even look like the G-Spot has been discussed yet

If I understand what I've read correctly sexedumacator (like the spelling?) is using the line "vaginal orgasms are a lie" as an outrageous promotion catch phrase to attract attention as well as saying most more experienced women only have orgasms with clitoral stimulation

Having been fortunate to know a few women, in my experience women who can have vaginal orgasms are very lucky and many women need clitoral stimulation to achieve orgasms ... (can we say reach around doggy style - sorry for being too graphic)

However some women can achieve satisfaction (including orgasms - YES PLURAL) through mental stimulation and prolonged intense passionate stimulation of VARIOUS erogenous zones

Once again I will state .......
SEX IS ALL ABOUT PASSION



I feel the heat
Call your name
Hold you close to victory
Don't want to tame your animal style
Won't be caged
the call of the wild


Dig if u will the picture
Of u and I engaged in a kiss
The sweat of your body covers me
Can u my darling
Can u picture this?

Dream if u can a courtyard
An ocean of violets in bloom
Animals strike curious poses
They feel the heat
The heat between me and u

You fell out of the clear blue sky
To the darkness below
The smell of your flesh excites me
My blood starts to flow
So help me God

You burst in in a blaze of light
You unzippered the dark
One kiss took my breath away
One look lights up the stars