Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Child Porn? (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=30987)

Winetalk.com 09-03-2003 11:24 AM

where was Ashcroft back in a day?
;-)))

http://www.wyldesites.com/nyc/IMG_0126.jpg

KC 09-04-2003 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Sep 3 2003, 10:32 AM
where was Ashcroft back in a day?
;-)))

http://www.wyldesites.com/nyc/IMG_0126.jpg

He was blowing one of his fellow kindergartners.

JR 09-04-2003 08:25 AM

thats not child porn.

Winetalk.com 09-04-2003 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JR@Sep 4 2003, 07:33 AM
thats not child porn.
she is under 16.....

clemsontiger 09-04-2003 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Sep 3 2003, 11:32 AM
where was Ashcroft back in a day?
;-)))

http://www.wyldesites.com/nyc/IMG_0126.jpg

Her head and her body don't look like they go together. It looks like the head of a child and the body of an adult.

Maybe thats just me.

PornoDoggy 09-04-2003 10:22 AM

Danny the Drape Man needs the dimensions of that picture immediately.

JR 09-04-2003 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Sep 4 2003, 05:41 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Sep 4 2003, 05:41 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--JR@Sep 4 2003, 07:33 AM
thats not child porn.
she is under 16.....[/b][/quote]
child porn is fairly well defined. obscenity is not.
under 16 does not mean "child porn"

Winetalk.com 09-04-2003 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JR+Sep 4 2003, 09:44 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (JR @ Sep 4 2003, 09:44 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Sep 4 2003, 05:41 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--JR
Quote:

@Sep 4 2003, 07:33 AM
thats not child porn.


she is under 16.....

child porn is fairly well defined. obscenity is not.
under 16 does not mean "child porn"[/b][/quote]
JR,
if statues were covered,
can you imagine this????
;-)))

JR 09-04-2003 11:05 AM

i guess you are referring to whatever that flap was about covering the statues. i did not see them.

the system is at work and seems to work pretty good, almost all of the time.

I know PD is waiting to get some misguided jabs in about McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover so we should probably wait until he gets that off his chest again first before pointing out that we have a highly fluid and ever evolving set of moral standards as a society and sometimes we agree with the flavor of the day.. sometimes we dont. that has always been true.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022