it never hurts- does it

Nice profile!

I wonder who ya gotta know to get on the cover of that thing?

thanks, I am sure Serge could hook you up :hic:

Maliciously create a thread title that impugns the integrity of a program owner for no reason and then don't acknowledge your mistake after the person you were championing admits you were wrong is what I'm guessing...

little self promotion MIGHT hurt...HUGE self promotion NEVER hurts
;-)))

Maliciously create a thread title that impugns the integrity of a program owner for no reason and then don't acknowledge your mistake after the person you were championing admits you were wrong is what I'm guessing...[/b][/quote]
I didnt create the thread he did...

He was just answering your question. :awinky:

He was just answering your question. :awinky:[/b][/quote]
...damn you stepped on my calling out to start the piss.
Remember I have been Serge's evil apprentice for several months now!

having read the interview.................

part seems to be merely a regurgitation of Serge's "Gold Rush" posts ,

part was the opinion of a rebel without a clue.

The rest however I must say , was total garbabge.

I read some of the same elements.

Hmmm, maybe you can clue me on as to what Gold Rush posts you are referring to. If you think I merely repeated what I read elsewhere, you are wrong.

I have never read anyone use the Gold Rush analogy (other than myself in previous interviews).

I am also interested in what you thought was garbage.

What you want me to write a fucking essay?

LOL

Dream on , I have given this far more time than it warrants already.

Good day!

;-))

Good read baddog.

Your one of the few people out there that actually take time to promote yourself.

You wouldn't believe how many lazy motherfuckers there are in this business that bitch and moan, they make no money. But then again..all they do is sit on their ass and wait for the next coming of Christ or something.

They want the money and the webmasters.
But, they don't wanna take a few minutes of their time to do whatever they need to do, to get them webmasters.

Sad, but true.
Fuck them all...let them rot on the unemployment line.

Maliciously create a thread title that impugns the integrity of a program owner for no reason and then don't acknowledge your mistake after the person you were championing admits you were wrong is what I'm guessing...[/b][/quote]
Maliciously? Yeah right. I was going on what was told to me. I di dnot feel the need to bump the thread back up to page one after PC made her post.

That would have served no purpose since most people don't read the entire thread anyways, so it would have only done more damage to FC than anything.

Oh, and for the record, the interview was set up in Phoenix, so it had nothing to do the the PC vs FC thread.

:wankit: :popcorn:

pfft. . . .what's the matter? You seem easy with the criticism, but can't back it up?

Good day, indeed.

Thank you, I do try.

pfft. . . .what's the matter? You seem easy with the criticism, but can't back it up?

Good day, indeed.[/b][/quote]
I said " Good Day" !!!!

Go sniff round some models or do whatever it is dickheads do.

I don't know, what is your daily schedule like? Does it include sniffing glue or models?

I read some of the same elements.[/b][/quote]
hmmm...people, when do you find time to read???

I, for one, is a WRITER and not a reader
;-))))

Good interview. and here I thought you just rode Harleys and stopped of at internet cafe's to work.

Maliciously? Yeah right. I was going on what was told to me. I di dnot feel the need to bump the thread back up to page one after PC made her post.

That would have served no purpose since most people don't read the entire thread anyways, so it would have only done more damage to FC than anything.

Oh, and for the record, the interview was set up in Phoenix, so it had nothing to do the the PC vs FC thread.[/b][/quote]
I see. Now you were looking out for Scott's best interests by not admitting you were wrong about the tone you created.

How noble...

:barfon:

I see. Now you were looking out for Scott's best interests by not admitting you were wrong about the tone you created.

How noble...

:barfon:[/b][/quote]
okay. . . what was I wrong about? PC thought she was let go the day she was diagnosed. Isn't that in fact what I relayed?



Last edited by baddog at Apr 16 2004, 11:08 AM

Truth be told, I have never been inside an Internet cafe, unless you want to count Starbucks.

Just as a follow up (to Diamond Jim, since he seems so concerned), I asked PC if she minded if I bumped the GFY thread to retract my comment (even though there really is nothing to retract), and she said she would prefer if the issue dropped from the boards.

I will abide by her wishes.

Sorry Jim.

corrections:
"It was essentially one of the first, if not the first freehosts targeting adult webmasters.
"

the VERY first free hosting was run by Joe Holler,
so you can eliminate "IF" from the next interview
;-)))

"The only thing I would definitely do differently would be to get into the providing of goods and services for webmasters a little sooner. I often use the analogy of the 1849 California Gold Rush.

There were tens of thousands of people rushing to California, seeking their fortune in the hills and rivers, hoping for that big strike, or the Mother Lode. Few ever saw their dream come true.

The ones that made the real money were the entrepreneurs that sold goods and services to the miners. Wells Fargo and Levi-Strauss are two examples of this. I like to think that eventually I will reach Well Fargo status, and if I had started a little earlier, perhaps this goal would be reached already.
"

all wrong...Levi Strauss made his money during Alaskan Gold Rush in 1898,
some 50 years later
;-)))
Klondike Gold Rush is a classical example of all "rushes", not California one which was MUCH smaller and much less dramatic...no frozen bodies along the way like in Alaska
;-)))

"Shaving. I will never understand why someone would stay with a program that they know are shaving them. As long as program owners know they can get away with it, it will continue, but I personally don't think it needs to be an accepted practice.
"



don't be a fool....
if XYZ pays $1000 per 10000 hits sent and counts only 7000 hits after shave while ABC pays $800 per 10,000 hits sent and counts 10,000 hits without shaving,
SMART people sent, send and will send traffic to shavers.

I hope you understand it now for your next interview
;-)))

the part of the industry where wolves eating sheep and spitting their bones remains in tact from the day one......and THIS will NEVER change
;-))))

...even if sheep don't know it yet or think they are not eaten but rather fatten up just because the wolf is a very kind wolf
;-))))

Serge I think you have salvedged this thread and made it a pearl thread!!

Mike, we had a few good this week,
I just moved this one there:
http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php?a...4f2a171b70fffb7

I'll move this one later on there too when it falls to second page
;-)))

Very nice!

Serge, I would like to interview baddog for oprano.com's new section, "Interviews That Sucks, with Masterp74" :okthumb:



Last edited by masterp74 at Apr 16 2004, 02:15 PM

hate to disagree with you, but Levi Strauss opened in 1854 in San Francisco. Perhaps he made more during the Klondike Rush, but he got his start from the Calif Gold Rush

I stand by my assertion.

if it was before 1996 and targeting adult, okay. I will remember it for the next time, if I ever bring it up again.



Last edited by baddog at Apr 16 2004, 02:47 PM

Hmmm, you should run for political office with your flip flopping

the question was, "Predictions for the future… where do you think the adult web will be a year from now?"

I don't think your observation would have been an appropriate response.

Of course, I do try to limit my comments to my perspective, and not that of others.

Hmmm, you should run for political office with your flip flopping[/b][/quote]
what do you mean? I promise you that the interviews I do will suck

what do you mean? I promise you that the interviews I do will suck[/b][/quote]
okay, maybe you should be a politician for sure, because your post could have been taken two ways . . . perfect for a politician :agrin:

okay, maybe you should be a politician for sure, because your post could have been taken two ways . . . perfect for a politician :agrin:[/b][/quote]
"masterp74 for mayor 2010" signs are in my garage as we speak