Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   .xxx TLD Near Reality (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=41289)

Trev 06-02-2005 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy@Jun 2 2005, 11:35 PM
I'm not denying the business aspect of it...I'm just sick of these guys selling everyone else down the river and claiming to be industry leaders and other such horseshit...the only thing they lead this industry in is fucking everyone else...
:okthumb:


BUT I bet if me and you could come up with the next "thing" to fuck everyone "legally" for 50mil you wouldn't say no :yowsa:

SykkBoy 06-02-2005 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trev+Jun 2 2005, 05:38 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Trev @ Jun 2 2005, 05:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Jun 2 2005, 11:35 PM
I'm not denying the business aspect of it...I'm just sick of these guys selling everyone else down the river and claiming to be industry leaders and other such horseshit...the only thing they lead this industry in is fucking everyone else...
:okthumb:


BUT I bet if me and you could come up with the next "thing" to fuck everyone "legally" for 50mil you wouldn't say no :yowsa: [/b][/quote]
perhaps, but I wouldn't be out acting like I represent the industry or am some type of industry leader ;-)

Trev 06-02-2005 06:55 PM

I still want to hear if MikeAI's version of "we" is the "royal we"....

Trev 06-02-2005 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy+Jun 2 2005, 11:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Jun 2 2005, 11:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 05:38 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy
Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:35 PM
I'm not denying the business aspect of it...I'm just sick of these guys selling everyone else down the river and claiming to be industry leaders and other such horseshit...the only thing they lead this industry in is fucking everyone else...


:okthumb:


BUT I bet if me and you could come up with the next "thing" to fuck everyone "legally" for 50mil you wouldn't say no :yowsa:

perhaps, but I wouldn't be out acting like I represent the industry or am some type of industry leader ;-) [/b][/quote]
So what role would you like to act in? because to pull big shit off takes big time experience in acting...

gonzo 06-02-2005 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 05:56 PM
I still want to hear if MikeAI's version of "we" is the "royal we"....
The correct term is ..."Porn Royalty" [self annointed] Also referred to as "West Coast Weenies". They all are "friends 4 life" until one of em gets greedy and punks them out. [See The Zoo] But other than hot air and a lot of hype/drama they bring nothing to the table. Youve seen them in the early years working for Levi, selling dick pills and now blowing out content.

A true "Porn Royal" will give the other ones... the "homie hook up". You know... you discover a company looking to break into online adult so they are looking to hire a "celebrity webmaster" [Always works for someone else usually for no longer than 3 months and never has anything of their own] and has some deep pockets.

So you give em the "homie hookup" - that is stand as a reference even though the company doesnt know either of you cant produce shit. Bleed em dry with your contacts [usually flashy non caucasion rappers who have nothing to do with the business] that produce little to nothing, convince them to sponsor or co-sponsor an event in Vegas or Florida so that you/PR can line up your next job while on someone elses payroll.


Mike AI once told me they had another word for this person..."employee".

**special thanks to Kath Blackwell, Serge and Mike AI for making these terms popular.

Trev 06-02-2005 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gonzo+Jun 3 2005, 12:17 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gonzo @ Jun 3 2005, 12:17 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 2 2005, 05:56 PM
I still want to hear if MikeAI's version of "we" is the "royal we"....
The correct term is ..."Porn Royalty" [self annointed] Also referred to as "West Coast Weenies". They all are "friends 4 life" until one of em gets greedy and punks them out. [See The Zoo] But other than hot air and a lot of hype/drama they bring nothing to the table. Youve seen them in the early years working for Levi, selling dick pills and now blowing out content.

A true "Porn Royal" will give the other ones... the "homie hook up". You know... you discover a company looking to break into online adult so they are looking to hire a "celebrity webmaster" [Always works for someone else usually for no longer than 3 months and never has anything of their own] and has some deep pockets.

So you give em the "homie hookup" - that is stand as a reference even though the company doesnt know either of you cant produce shit. Bleed em dry with your contacts [usually flashy non caucasion rappers who have nothing to do with the business] that produce little to nothing, convince them to sponsor or co-sponsor an event in Vegas or Florida so that you/PR can line up your next job while on someone elses payroll.


Mike AI once told me they had another word for this person..."employee".

**special thanks to Kath Blackwell, Serge and Mike AI for making these terms popular. [/b][/quote]
I've bolded my quote!

grimm 06-02-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rolo@Jun 2 2005, 08:42 AM
Here is one more supporter, beside helmy/gigacash/asacp:

Quote:


[stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
To: <stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [stld-rfp-xxx] A Responsible First Step for the Adult Industry
From: "Lawrence G. Walters" <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:12:42 -0500
Importance: Normal
Organization: Weston, Garrou & DeWitt
Sender: owner-stld-rfp-xxx@xxxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the good of the adult Internet industry, this proposal should be approved. Having provided legal representation to the adult webmaster community since 1995, along with other facets of the adult industry for years before, I’ve seen many unsuccessful attempts to organize and speak with a united voice. Organizing in the adult Internet industry is essential; just as it is with any other highly-regulated industry. My law firm has represented the adult industry for over 40 years, and has been involved in many organizing efforts. It may be that the only way for this particular facet of the industry to organize is through a non-profit foundation structured to support both the online adult community and the broader Internet community funded through .xxx registration revenue. A .xxx domain name option will eventually become a reality, and the current proposal will result in significant benefit to the industry as a whole, given the significant funding that IFFOR could potentially secure for the purposes of lobbying, legal defense, and media outreach.

When compared to a generic TLD proposal, the current Sponsored TLD proposal is definitely preferable. In light of the current political climate in the United States and elsewhere, IFFOR could become a critical voice for the continued viability and success of the adult website industry. Regardless of one’s feelings concerning the esoteric advisability of a voluntary .xxx domain name registration option, the practical realities must be addressed. Some entity will ultimately convince ICANN to approve a TLD for the adult industry. The current proposal by ICM Registries, Inc., sponsored by IFFOR, will bestow benefits on the industry which far outweigh any of the potential concerns advanced to date. The webmaster community should get behind this proposal which will give something back, instead of waiting for another group to submit a generic TLD proposal based purely on profit motive.

http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00003.html

http://www.lawrencewalters.com/image...image_home.jpg
http://www.lawrencewalters.com/

what is this man looking at?

*KK* 06-02-2005 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?

Well, your ass is cute.

grimm 06-02-2005 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trev+Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Trev @ Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o

'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI? [/b][/quote]
we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere.

grimm 06-02-2005 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*+Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*KK* @ Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-grimm@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?

Well, your ass is cute. [/b][/quote]
indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)

*KK* 06-02-2005 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm
Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.

indeed;) You cant blame him, really:) [/b][/quote]
Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)

grimm 06-02-2005 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*+Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*KK* @ Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)

Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :) [/b][/quote]
heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)

gigi 06-03-2005 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 2 2005, 05:01 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 2 2005, 05:01 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI
Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o


'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?

we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere. [/b][/quote]
THANK you! I was starting to get really depressed reading this thread.... :P

This is the only thing I question:

Quote:

WHAT WILL BE THE OBLIGATIONS OF .XXX TLD REGISTRANTS?
Participating Internet content and service providers believe that responsible self-regulation is essential to the industry’s continuing viability in the global marketplace. Internet content and service providers that voluntarily register the domain names will adhere to a high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry. The credibility of such practices cannot be preserved by the one time creation of a set of responsible business practices: iFOR must establish, revise and continually update these practices to accommodate developments in technologies and societal expectations.

How will they decide on this 'high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry? What will it entail?

Does this mean they can dictate what type of content goes onto these domains? Will they be able to dictate how I run by business? Is this 'high level' of set business practices any different than the contracts used for other TLDs? Inquiring minds want to know....

The premise that the formation of this TLD is rooted in issues concerning CP is laughable....and brilliant....

Trev 06-03-2005 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 3 2005, 02:01 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 3 2005, 02:01 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI
Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o


'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?

we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere. [/b][/quote]
I don’t buy into hysteria; it’s so over rated.

As for .xxx tld making a ton of money for anyone with business sense (by which I’m assuming your saying I’ve none) I’d rather take my $75 buy 7 or 8 .com's and run them the way I want and not according to some cocksuckers rules.

Almighty Colin 06-03-2005 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Timon+Jun 2 2005, 11:26 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Timon @ Jun 2 2005, 11:26 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by Almighty Colin@Jun 2 2005, 10:39 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Timon
Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 09:20 AM
I call XXX.XXX

Nobody else register it, it's mine!!!!


amsterdamnxxx.xxx

oh I call amsterdamncumbath.xxx too :lol: [/b][/quote]
yeah, that one ;-)

grimm 06-03-2005 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gigi+Jun 2 2005, 09:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gigi @ Jun 2 2005, 09:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:01 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o


'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?


we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere.

THANK you! I was starting to get really depressed reading this thread.... :P

This is the only thing I question:

Quote:

WHAT WILL BE THE OBLIGATIONS OF .XXX TLD REGISTRANTS?
Participating Internet content and service providers believe that responsible self-regulation is essential to the industry’s continuing viability in the global marketplace. Internet content and service providers that voluntarily register the domain names will adhere to a high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry. The credibility of such practices cannot be preserved by the one time creation of a set of responsible business practices: iFOR must establish, revise and continually update these practices to accommodate developments in technologies and societal expectations.

How will they decide on this 'high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry? What will it entail?

Does this mean they can dictate what type of content goes onto these domains? Will they be able to dictate how I run by business? Is this 'high level' of set business practices any different than the contracts used for other TLDs? Inquiring minds want to know....

The premise that the formation of this TLD is rooted in issues concerning CP is laughable....and brilliant.... [/b][/quote]
in other words, it will be up to the discretion of ICM to act as a clearing house for the .xxx TLD. more than likely it will be in their judgement to allow resellers based on content and regulation, a smokescreen of horseshit meaning politics, between ICM, its backers and its resellers. Any thoughts of a registrar doing anything for the betterment of the safety of its surfers is ridiculous, the backers of this company are going to want profits, and to get profits they are going to have to sell domains, and they arent going to sell a whole lot of them to adult webmasters, other than speculators, because of the paranoid attitude in the industry. so the rules will be bent to the point of breaking, finding a comfot level between ICM, the backers, the resellers and whatever politics suits the day. case closed. :)

pay attention to the money, it tells the whole story, start to finish

grimm 06-03-2005 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trev+Jun 2 2005, 11:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Trev @ Jun 2 2005, 11:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 3 2005, 02:01 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o


'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?


we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere.

I don’t buy into hysteria; it’s so over rated.

As for .xxx tld making a ton of money for anyone with business sense (by which I’m assuming your saying I’ve none) I’d rather take my $75 buy 7 or 8 .com's and run them the way I want and not according to some cocksuckers rules. [/b][/quote]
i didnt say .xxx domain holders would make money in conventional ways. paranoia over regulation will curb some of it, but at the end of the day they will sell a bunch of domains, and people will build sites on them, if for nothing else than the availability of good one or two word domains. also having an effect is the spidering of the SE's


anyone seen yahoos new project?

mindset.research.yahoo.com

the way of the search going to engines like that should spook webmasters more than a simple new .tld, for sure. one click, and all commercial searches are filtered out.

grimm 06-03-2005 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gigi+Jun 2 2005, 09:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gigi @ Jun 2 2005, 09:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:01 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 2 2005, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mike AI

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 11:30 PM
Of course anyone would do what they did. It is a smart business decission to own any TLD.

We will make money off of it somehow.... :o


'We' as in Directnic or 'we' as in MikeAI?


we as in anyone with business sense. a new .tld opens up a ton of opportunity. .com will always be there. just because .xxx will be available doesnt herd anyone into a cage. dont go chicken little, its really no big deal. people are making a large amount of assumptions of possibilities down the line. any possibility you think, there are hundreds of others. hysteria wont get you anywhere.

THANK you! I was starting to get really depressed reading this thread.... :P

This is the only thing I question:

Quote:

WHAT WILL BE THE OBLIGATIONS OF .XXX TLD REGISTRANTS?
Participating Internet content and service providers believe that responsible self-regulation is essential to the industry’s continuing viability in the global marketplace. Internet content and service providers that voluntarily register the domain names will adhere to a high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry. The credibility of such practices cannot be preserved by the one time creation of a set of responsible business practices: iFOR must establish, revise and continually update these practices to accommodate developments in technologies and societal expectations.

How will they decide on this 'high-level set of business practices, embodied in an enforceable contract between the Registrant and ICM Registry? What will it entail?

Does this mean they can dictate what type of content goes onto these domains? Will they be able to dictate how I run by business? Is this 'high level' of set business practices any different than the contracts used for other TLDs? Inquiring minds want to know....

The premise that the formation of this TLD is rooted in issues concerning CP is laughable....and brilliant.... [/b][/quote]
as for the last part, the CP end of it seems to be blaring from an adult mouthpiece and not a political one. who would have what to gain from that argument? obviously a backer involved in the industry. it takes a certain amount of understanding to market a project in such a way, and politicians have shown ineptitude when it comes to understanding domain and traffic markets, so i doubt it comes from an authority on high. like you said, good marketing.

Rolo 06-03-2005 08:09 AM

I do not care if they make 50 million or more from the .xxx TLD, what I do not like is the wimpy little wankers that use this as a way to speak on behalf of the adult industry. Yeah - I know that there is no official voice in the industry, so its easy for someone to step up on the soapbox, and speak for all of us :barfon: but fuck do it with a bit more of class, instead of working it like a toothless 1 dollar crack whore.

Quote:


“As a voluntary TLD we offer the industry to chance to regularize their business procedures and become a much more legitimized industry as a result of this,” Hendeles said. “A lot of people are going to jump on it and we’re not forcing anyone to give up their .coms, but those people that are in the .xxx space are all indicating their agreement to act responsibly"

In other words - .xxx are the good guys - .com are the bad guys... well, atleast .com domain holders didn´t have to bribe some icann board members to get their domains, and atleast we are not looking at letting the FTC, Religious/Political groups etc. fuck us in the ass, so we can be their bitch (have the .com people ever talked about working with the FTC to rid the internet of adult content?).

And how many GREAT .com adult domains are there today? 10.000? 20.000? 50.000? How many .xxx domains do you think these sellouts have reserved to themself? 10.000? 20.000? 50.000? ICANN made a major mistake, and I hope they will wake up, and see what mess they have created.

*KK* 06-03-2005 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm


Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)

heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:) [/b][/quote]
I think I could take you ;)

grimm 06-03-2005 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*+Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*KK* @ Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)


heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)

I think I could take you ;) [/b][/quote]
Ive been drinking milk! :)

*KK* 06-03-2005 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 3 2005, 12:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 3 2005, 12:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm




Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)


heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)


I think I could take you ;)

Ive been drinking milk! :) [/b][/quote]
With your Wheaties I hope ;)

grimm 06-03-2005 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*+Jun 3 2005, 12:49 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*KK* @ Jun 3 2005, 12:49 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 3 2005, 12:37 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm





Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)


heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)


I think I could take you ;)


Ive been drinking milk! :)

With your Wheaties I hope ;) [/b][/quote]
of course, two bowls a day!

*KK* 06-03-2005 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by grimm+Jun 3 2005, 01:17 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (grimm @ Jun 3 2005, 01:17 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 12:49 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 3 2005, 12:37 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm






Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)


heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)


I think I could take you ;)


Ive been drinking milk! :)


With your Wheaties I hope ;)

of course, two bowls a day! [/b][/quote]
You should be quite regular in the fiber department then ;)

Trev 06-03-2005 05:58 PM

You guys could try dating in the real world :tpe:

grimm 06-03-2005 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*+Jun 3 2005, 01:31 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (*KK* @ Jun 3 2005, 01:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 3 2005, 01:17 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 12:49 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 3 2005, 12:37 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 3 2005, 11:36 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:07 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:04 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by grimm@Jun 2 2005, 05:02 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by *KK*@Jun 2 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-grimm







Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

@Jun 2 2005, 04:55 PM

what is this man looking at?


Well, your ass is cute.


indeed;) You cant blame him, really:)


Oh I should be the last one apportioning any blame at this point in life. :)


heh you'd have to wrestle that last place in line from me:)


I think I could take you ;)


Ive been drinking milk! :)


With your Wheaties I hope ;)


of course, two bowls a day!

You should be quite regular in the fiber department then ;) [/b][/quote]
no worries on the southern front:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 PM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022